By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Lawyer's ArcLawyer's ArcLawyer's Arc
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Opportunity
    • Paid Law Internships
    • Internships
    • Jobs
    • Events & Workshops
    • Moot Court
    • Call For Papers
  • Editorials
  • Case Analysis
  • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Disclaimer
    • Privacy Policy
    • Refund and Cancellation Policy
    • Terms of Service
  • Submit Blog
Reading: KERALA HIGH COURT REJECTS CBI PROBE IN 2017 MALAYALAM ACTRESS ASSAULT CASE INVOLVING ACTOR DILEEP
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Font ResizerAa
Lawyer's ArcLawyer's Arc
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Case Analysis
  • Subject Notes
  • Jobs
  • Opportunity
  • Editorials
  • About Us
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Case Analysis
  • Subject Notes
    • LAW OF TORT
    • Constitution Law
    • CRIMINAL LAW
    • Family law
    • Contract Law
    • IPR
    • international law
    • Banking law
    • COMPANY LAW
    • CYBER LAW
    • Environmental law
  • Jobs
  • Opportunity
    • Internships
    • Paid Law Internships
    • Events & Workshops
  • Editorials
  • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Disclaimer
    • Privacy Policy
    • Refund and Cancellation Policy
    • Terms of Service
    • Submit Blog Post
Follow US
© Lawyer's Arc 2020-2025. All Rights Reserved.
Lawyer's Arc > Editorials > KERALA HIGH COURT REJECTS CBI PROBE IN 2017 MALAYALAM ACTRESS ASSAULT CASE INVOLVING ACTOR DILEEP
EditorialsNews

KERALA HIGH COURT REJECTS CBI PROBE IN 2017 MALAYALAM ACTRESS ASSAULT CASE INVOLVING ACTOR DILEEP

Yash Singhal
Last updated: 07/04/2025 9:04 PM
Yash Singhal
Published 07/04/2025
Share
3 Min Read
SHARE

The Kerala High Court on Monday dismissed a plea filed by Malayalam actor P Gopalakrishnan alias Dileep seeking a Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) probe into the 2017 actress assault case, in which he is the prime accused.

Contents
BACKGROUND OF THE CASECHARGES AGAINST DILEEPCOURT’S OBSERVATIONSKEY DEVELOPMENTS IN THE CASECONCLUSION

A Division Bench of Justice A Muhamed Mustaque and Justice P Krishna Kumar ruled against the CBI transfer, citing that the trial is in its final stage before the Ernakulam Principal District and Sessions Court. It does not warrant fresh investigation at this juncture.

BACKGROUND OF THE CASE

The case dates back to February 2017, when a prominent Malayalam actress was abducted and sexually assaulted in a moving vehicle. The incident shocked the state and the film fraternity.

-Story After Advertisement -

Actor Dileep was later arrested in July 2017 for allegedly orchestrating the assault as an act of personal revenge. It was claimed that the actress had informed Dileep’s then-wife, Manju Warrier, about his alleged extra-marital affair, which contributed to the breakdown of their marriage.

CHARGES AGAINST DILEEP

  • Section 366 IPC – Kidnapping
  • Section 120B IPC – Criminal Conspiracy
  • Section 376D IPC – Gang Rape

Dileep was arrested along with five others and was initially denied bail twice before being granted conditional bail in October 2017.

COURT’S OBSERVATIONS

Dileep had previously approached the Kerala High Court in 2018 seeking a CBI probe, alleging bias in the state police investigation. That plea was rejected by Justice Sunil Thomas, prompting the current appeal.

-Story After Advertisement -

On Monday, the Division Bench found no merit in the renewed demand for a CBI probe.

“The trial is already in its concluding stage. There is no requirement for transferring the case to the CBI at this point,” the Bench stated.

However, the Court also held that certain observations made by the single judge in the earlier ruling were unwarranted.

-Story After Advertisement -

“The single judge’s observations on how intense media scrutiny has affected the investigation was unnecessary and therefore, stands eschewed,” the Bench clarified.

The Court also noted that references made by the single judge regarding new witnesses and alleged bias were made only when deciding the original petition and should not influence the trial proceedings.

KEY DEVELOPMENTS IN THE CASE

2017: Assault incident occurs; six people arrested.

-Story After Advertisement -

July 2017: Dileep was arrested and charged.

October 2017: Dileep was granted bail.

2018: Dileep seeks CBI probe; petition dismissed.

-Story After Advertisement -

2019: Appeal filed.

April 2025: Division Bench dismisses the appeal, citing ongoing trial.

CONCLUSION

With this order, the Kerala High Court has closed the door on transferring the investigation to the CBI, reinforcing that the judicial process should proceed without further interference. The actress assault case, one of the most high-profile cases in Kerala’s recent legal history, continues in the final leg of its trial.


Related

You Might Also Like

SUPREME COURT STRUGGLES WITH JUSTICE SURESHWAR THAKUR’S JUDGMENT, STAYS HIGH COURT ORDER ON NATIONAL HIGHWAYS ACT

India-Pakistan Tensions: Pakistan Breaches Ceasefire Again Despite Recent Agreement with India

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ORDERS PRESERVATION OF BYJU’S CIRP EMAIL RECORDS AMID CRIMINAL PROBE

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT ORDERS DEPLOYMENT OF CENTRAL ARMED FORCES IN MURSHIDABAD AFTER WAQF ACT PROTEST TURNS VIOLENT

UP COP NAMES JUDGE AS ACCUSED IN THEFT CASE PROCLAMATION, COURT ORDERS PROBE

TAGGED:Kerala High Court
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Share
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
YoutubeSubscribe
TelegramFollow

Join Telegram Channel

Join Whatsapp Channel

- Advertisement -
Lawyer's Arc Logo

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
[mc4wp_form]
Popular News
LAW OF TORT

False Imprisonment and Malicious Prosecution Under Tort

LA | Admin
LA | Admin
18/03/2024
Internship Opportunity at Lawyer’s Arc
Right to Freedom of Religion (Articles 25-28)
Advocates (Amendment) Bill, 2025 : The Future of Advocacy in India
Download AIBE 19 Result Live : How & Where to Download Result Aibe XIX
- Advertisement -
Submit Post LAwyer's ArcSubmit Post LAwyer's Arc
- Advertisement -
Archives
False Imprisonment and Malicious Prosecution Under Tort
18/03/2024
Lawyer's Arc Internship
Internship Opportunity at Lawyer’s Arc
23/04/2025
Right to Freedom of Religion (Articles 25-28)
18/03/2024
Advocates Amendment Bill
Advocates (Amendment) Bill, 2025 : The Future of Advocacy in India
22/02/2025
AIBE 19 RESULT DOWNLOAD
Download AIBE 19 Result Live : How & Where to Download Result Aibe XIX
23/03/2025

You Might Also Like

EditorialsNews

SUPREME COURT DIRECTS FSSAI TO SUBMIT REPORT ON FRONT-OF-PACKAGE WARNING LABELS WITHIN THREE MONTHS

13/04/2025
EditorialsNews

MADRAS HIGH COURT SLAMS DELAY IN COMPASSIONATE APPOINTMENT, ORDERS JOB FOR DECEASED GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEE’S WIDOW

13/04/2025
EditorialsNews

SUPREME COURT CLARIFIES PRESIDENT AND GOVERNOR’S POWERS OVER STATE BILLS IN LANDMARK VERDICT

12/04/2025
EditorialsNews

KERALA HIGH COURT GRANTS BAIL TO 91-YEAR-OLD MAN ACCUSED OF ATTACKING 88-YEAR-OLD WIFE OVER ALLEGED INFIDELITY

12/04/2025
Lawyer's ArcLawyer's Arc
© Lawyer's Arc 2020-2025. All Rights Reserved.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?