By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Lawyer's ArcLawyer's ArcLawyer's Arc
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Opportunity
    • Paid Law Internships
    • Internships
    • Jobs
    • Events & Workshops
    • Moot Court
    • Call For Papers
  • Editorials
  • Case Analysis
  • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Disclaimer
    • Privacy Policy
    • Refund and Cancellation Policy
    • Terms of Service
  • Submit Blog
Reading: DEFAMATION PUNE COURT REJECTS RAHUL GANDHI’S PLEA SEEKING DISCLOSURE OF SATYAKI SAVARKAR’S MATERNAL LINEAGE IN SAVARKAR DEFAMATION CASE (JUNE 2)
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Font ResizerAa
Lawyer's ArcLawyer's Arc
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Case Analysis
  • Subject Notes
  • Jobs
  • Opportunity
  • Editorials
  • About Us
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Case Analysis
  • Subject Notes
    • LAW OF TORT
    • Constitution Law
    • CRIMINAL LAW
    • Family law
    • Contract Law
    • IPR
    • international law
    • Banking law
    • COMPANY LAW
    • CYBER LAW
    • Environmental law
  • Jobs
  • Opportunity
    • Internships
    • Paid Law Internships
    • Events & Workshops
  • Editorials
  • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Disclaimer
    • Privacy Policy
    • Refund and Cancellation Policy
    • Terms of Service
    • Submit Blog Post
Follow US
© Lawyer's Arc 2020-2025. All Rights Reserved.
Lawyer's Arc > LAW OF TORT > DEFAMATION PUNE COURT REJECTS RAHUL GANDHI’S PLEA SEEKING DISCLOSURE OF SATYAKI SAVARKAR’S MATERNAL LINEAGE IN SAVARKAR DEFAMATION CASE (JUNE 2)
LAW OF TORT

DEFAMATION PUNE COURT REJECTS RAHUL GANDHI’S PLEA SEEKING DISCLOSURE OF SATYAKI SAVARKAR’S MATERNAL LINEAGE IN SAVARKAR DEFAMATION CASE (JUNE 2)

Aaryansh Agrawal
Last updated: 03/06/2025 2:28 PM
Aaryansh Agrawal
Published 03/06/2025
Share
5 Min Read
SHARE

PUNE, JUNE 2, 2025 —

A Pune court has rejected an application filed by Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha, Rahul Gandhi, seeking to compel Satyaki Savarkar, the complainant in the Vinayak Damodar Savarkar defamation case, to disclose details of his maternal lineage. Gandhi had alleged that Satyaki is the grandson of Gopal Vinayak Godse, the younger brother of Nathuram Godse, who assassinated Mahatma Gandhi. had deliberately concealed material facts regarding his maternal lineage — specifically, that he is the grandson of Gopal Vinayak Godse, the younger brother of Mahatma Gandhi’s assassin Nathuram Godse [Satyaki Savarkar v. Rahul Gandhi].

Contents
PUNE, JUNE 2, 2025 —COURT FINDS NO MERIT IN GANDHI’S PLEABACKGROUND OF THE DEFAMATION CASERAHUL GANDHI’S ALLEGATIONS ON CONCEALMENT OF LINEAGELEGAL REPRESENTATION

COURT FINDS NO MERIT IN GANDHI’S PLEA

Judicial Magistrate (First Class) Amol Shriram Shinde dismissed Gandhi’s application, stating that the complainant’s family background is irrelevant to the current proceedings.

“The case is not related or family tree of late Smt. Himani Ashok Savarkar is not disputed in this case. Therefore, this court does not find any merits in the application of the accused. There is also no need to send matter for further investigation. Hence the application sans merits and same is liable to be rejected,”

-Story After Advertisement -

— Order dated May 28, 2025.

The court emphasized that the central issue pertains to the alleged defamatory remarks made by Rahul Gandhi against Vinayak Savarkar, and not the personal history of the complainant.

BACKGROUND OF THE DEFAMATION CASE

In March 2023, during a speech in London, Rahul Gandhi had allegedly referred to an incident supposedly described in Savarkar’s writings, where he claimed that Savarkar found pleasure in assaulting a Muslim man.

-Story After Advertisement -

Satyaki Savarkar, identifying himself as the grandnephew of Vinayak Damodar Savarkar, denied the existence of such a passage in Savarkar’s writings. He subsequently filed a defamation complaint seeking Gandhi’s conviction under Section 500 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and compensation under Section 357 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC).

RAHUL GANDHI’S ALLEGATIONS ON CONCEALMENT OF LINEAGE

In response, Rahul Gandhi claimed that Satyaki had “deliberately, systematically, very brilliantly avoided, and suppressed” disclosing his maternal family tree, which allegedly links him directly to the Godse family.

“As per information, mother of complainant late Smt. Himani Ashok Savarkar is daughter of Gopal Vinayak Godse, younger brother of Nathuram Vinayak Godse, who killed father of nation Mahatma Gandhi on 30/01/1948 and was hanged along with his accomplice Narayan Apte on 15/11/1949,”

-Story After Advertisement -

— Rahul Gandhi in court filing.

Gandhi further pointed out that Satyaki’s mother, Himani Ashok Savarkar, was associated with Hindutva organisations such as Abhinav Bharat and Akhil Bhartiya Hindu Mahasabha.

According to Gandhi, the alleged ideological and blood ties between the Godse and Savarkar families are essential to determining whether the legacy of Vinayak Savarkar — the subject of Gandhi’s remarks — was actually defamed.

-Story After Advertisement -

Though Satyaki submitted two versions of his paternal family tree, Gandhi emphasized that no information was provided about his maternal side, which, he argued, holds legal and historical relevance.

Gandhi had requested that:

The court direct Satyaki to file an affidavit disclosing his maternal lineage;

-Story After Advertisement -

Alternatively, the matter be referred for further investigation under Section 173(8) CrPC to Vishrambag Police Station, Pune.

Court’s Earlier Ruling in Favour of Gandhi

Although this latest plea has been rejected, the court had earlier in May 2025 accepted Rahul Gandhi’s request to convert the proceedings from a summary trial to a summons trial, allowing the inclusion of broader documentary and historical evidence. Gandhi had justified this procedural change by stating that his statements were based on “verifiable historical sources.”

LEGAL REPRESENTATION

Advocate Milind Pawar appeared on behalf of Rahul Gandhi.

Advocate Sangram Kolhatkar represented Satyaki Savarkar.

Current Status

The defamation case is yet to be heard on merits, and the recent ruling marks only a procedural development in the ongoing legal battle.

Read More- https//lawyers arc.com/news/savarkar-defamation-pune-court-rejects-rahul-gandhi-plea-maternal-lineage-disclosure

Related

You Might Also Like

Defamation – Civil Liability and Free Speech in India

Tort Law – Definition, Types & Examples

Remedies Available in Law of Tort

TRESPASS TO PERSON : Assault, Battery and False Imprisonment under law of tort

False Imprisonment and Malicious Prosecution Under Tort

Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Share
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
YoutubeSubscribe
TelegramFollow

Join Telegram Channel

Join Whatsapp Channel

- Advertisement -
Lawyer's Arc Logo

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
[mc4wp_form]
Popular News
LAW OF TORT

False Imprisonment and Malicious Prosecution Under Tort

LA | Admin
LA | Admin
18/03/2024
Internship Opportunity at Lawyer’s Arc
Right to Freedom of Religion (Articles 25-28)
Advocates (Amendment) Bill, 2025 : The Future of Advocacy in India
Download AIBE 19 Result Live : How & Where to Download Result Aibe XIX
- Advertisement -
Submit Post LAwyer's ArcSubmit Post LAwyer's Arc
- Advertisement -
Archives
False Imprisonment and Malicious Prosecution Under Tort
18/03/2024
Lawyer's Arc Internship
Internship Opportunity at Lawyer’s Arc
23/04/2025
Right to Freedom of Religion (Articles 25-28)
18/03/2024
Advocates Amendment Bill
Advocates (Amendment) Bill, 2025 : The Future of Advocacy in India
22/02/2025
AIBE 19 RESULT DOWNLOAD
Download AIBE 19 Result Live : How & Where to Download Result Aibe XIX
23/03/2025
Lawyer's ArcLawyer's Arc
© Lawyer's Arc 2020-2025. All Rights Reserved.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?