By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Lawyer's ArcLawyer's ArcLawyer's Arc
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Opportunity
    • Paid Law Internships
    • Internships
    • Jobs
    • Events & Workshops
    • Moot Court
    • Call For Papers
  • Editorials
  • Case Analysis
  • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Disclaimer
    • Privacy Policy
    • Refund and Cancellation Policy
    • Terms of Service
  • Submit Blog
Reading: BOMBAY HIGH COURT TO HEAR KUNAL KAMRA’S PLEA TO QUASH FIR OVER ‘GADDAR’ REMARK AGAINST EKNATH SHINDE
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Font ResizerAa
Lawyer's ArcLawyer's Arc
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Case Analysis
  • Subject Notes
  • Jobs
  • Opportunity
  • Editorials
  • About Us
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Case Analysis
  • Subject Notes
    • LAW OF TORT
    • Constitution Law
    • CRIMINAL LAW
    • Family law
    • Contract Law
    • IPR
    • international law
    • Banking law
    • COMPANY LAW
    • CYBER LAW
    • Environmental law
  • Jobs
  • Opportunity
    • Internships
    • Paid Law Internships
    • Events & Workshops
  • Editorials
  • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Disclaimer
    • Privacy Policy
    • Refund and Cancellation Policy
    • Terms of Service
    • Submit Blog Post
Follow US
© Lawyer's Arc 2020-2025. All Rights Reserved.
Lawyer's Arc > Editorials > BOMBAY HIGH COURT TO HEAR KUNAL KAMRA’S PLEA TO QUASH FIR OVER ‘GADDAR’ REMARK AGAINST EKNATH SHINDE
EditorialsNews

BOMBAY HIGH COURT TO HEAR KUNAL KAMRA’S PLEA TO QUASH FIR OVER ‘GADDAR’ REMARK AGAINST EKNATH SHINDE

Stand-up Comedian Kunal Kamra. File | Photo Credit: X/@kunalkamra
Yash Singhal
Last updated: 07/04/2025 9:05 PM
Yash Singhal
Published 07/04/2025
Share
4 Min Read
SHARE

The Bombay High Court on Monday agreed to hear a plea filed by stand-up comedian Kunal Kamra. He is seeking the quashing of an FIR lodged against him for allegedly referring to Maharashtra Deputy Chief Minister Eknath Shinde as a “gaddar” (traitor) during a performance.

Contents
URGENT MENTIONING AMID DEATH THREATSCOURT SUGGESTS EXPLORING ANTICIPATORY BAILWHAT SPARKED THE FIR ?KEY DEVELOPMENTS

A Division Bench comprising Justice Sarang Kotwal and Justice SM Modak scheduled the matter for urgent hearing on Tuesday, April 8, following a request by Senior Advocate Navroz Seervai, who cited “extreme urgency” in light of death threats issued to Kamra.

URGENT MENTIONING AMID DEATH THREATS

Kamra’s petition was originally listed for April 21, but his legal team approached the Court on Monday for an earlier date, citing safety concerns.

-Story After Advertisement -

“It is a matter of extreme urgency and some concern… going through the fundamental rights and not so much criminal law,” Seervai told the Bench while seeking urgent listing.

He added that the Madras High Court had granted Kamra interim protection from coercive action, but that protection expires today (April 7).

“Death threats are being given to the petitioner. The Madras High Court has taken cognizance of the threats and immediately granted interim protection till today,” Seervai said.

-Story After Advertisement -

He also informed the court that Mumbai police had reached Pondicherry, where Kamra is currently staying.

“We have filed the petition on Saturday. The situation is very grave. There are reports that the police has already reached Pondicherry,” he added.

COURT SUGGESTS EXPLORING ANTICIPATORY BAIL

Justice Kotwal, while agreeing to hear the plea on Tuesday, also suggested that Kamra explore the anticipatory bail route before the jurisdictional court.

-Story After Advertisement -

“We will consider this petition independently, but you also consider the other route,” Justice Kotwal noted, referring to the Supreme Court’s ruling in the Priya Indoria case.

Seervai acknowledged the suggestion but pressed the court to proceed with the hearing on constitutional grounds, given the threats faced by Kamra.

Although the Bench declined to take up the matter post-lunch on Monday, it accepted the plea for urgent listing and posted the matter for April 8.

-Story After Advertisement -

WHAT SPARKED THE FIR ?

The FIR against Kunal Kamra was filed in Mumbai based on a complaint by Shiv Sena MLA Muraji Patel, accusing the comedian of public mischief and defamation under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS).

Kamra allegedly called Deputy CM Eknath Shinde a “gaddar” during a comedy performance, clear reference to Shinde’s 2022 rebellion against Uddhav Thackeray’s Shiv Sena, which led to a split in the party and the formation of a BJP-Shinde faction government in Maharashtra.

Kamra has been booked under Sections 353(1)(b), 353(2) (public mischief) and 356(2) (defamation) of the BNS.

-Story After Advertisement -

The comedian, who is a resident of Villupuram, Tamil Nadu, had secured interim anticipatory bail from the Madras High Court on March 28, which is valid only till April 7.

KEY DEVELOPMENTS

  • Kunal Kamra seeks to quash FIR filed in Mumbai over ‘gaddar’ remark aimed at Eknath Shinde.
  • Case triggered by a complaint from Shiv Sena MLA Muraji Patel.
  • Kamra faces charges under BNS Sections 353(1)(b), 353(2), and 356(2).
  • Kamra received death threats; the Madras High Court granted interim protection, expiring today.
  • Bombay High Court to hear the plea on April 8.
  • Justice Kotwal advises exploring the anticipatory bail route.

Related

You Might Also Like

SUPREME COURT STRUGGLES WITH JUSTICE SURESHWAR THAKUR’S JUDGMENT, STAYS HIGH COURT ORDER ON NATIONAL HIGHWAYS ACT

India-Pakistan Tensions: Pakistan Breaches Ceasefire Again Despite Recent Agreement with India

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ORDERS PRESERVATION OF BYJU’S CIRP EMAIL RECORDS AMID CRIMINAL PROBE

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT ORDERS DEPLOYMENT OF CENTRAL ARMED FORCES IN MURSHIDABAD AFTER WAQF ACT PROTEST TURNS VIOLENT

UP COP NAMES JUDGE AS ACCUSED IN THEFT CASE PROCLAMATION, COURT ORDERS PROBE

TAGGED:Bombay High Court
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Share
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
YoutubeSubscribe
TelegramFollow

Join Telegram Channel

Join Whatsapp Channel

- Advertisement -
Lawyer's Arc Logo

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
[mc4wp_form]
Popular News
LAW OF TORT

False Imprisonment and Malicious Prosecution Under Tort

LA | Admin
LA | Admin
18/03/2024
Internship Opportunity at Lawyer’s Arc
Right to Freedom of Religion (Articles 25-28)
Advocates (Amendment) Bill, 2025 : The Future of Advocacy in India
Download AIBE 19 Result Live : How & Where to Download Result Aibe XIX
- Advertisement -
Submit Post LAwyer's ArcSubmit Post LAwyer's Arc
- Advertisement -
Archives
False Imprisonment and Malicious Prosecution Under Tort
18/03/2024
Lawyer's Arc Internship
Internship Opportunity at Lawyer’s Arc
23/04/2025
Right to Freedom of Religion (Articles 25-28)
18/03/2024
Advocates Amendment Bill
Advocates (Amendment) Bill, 2025 : The Future of Advocacy in India
22/02/2025
AIBE 19 RESULT DOWNLOAD
Download AIBE 19 Result Live : How & Where to Download Result Aibe XIX
23/03/2025

You Might Also Like

EditorialsNews

SUPREME COURT DIRECTS FSSAI TO SUBMIT REPORT ON FRONT-OF-PACKAGE WARNING LABELS WITHIN THREE MONTHS

13/04/2025
EditorialsNews

MADRAS HIGH COURT SLAMS DELAY IN COMPASSIONATE APPOINTMENT, ORDERS JOB FOR DECEASED GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEE’S WIDOW

13/04/2025
EditorialsNews

SUPREME COURT CLARIFIES PRESIDENT AND GOVERNOR’S POWERS OVER STATE BILLS IN LANDMARK VERDICT

12/04/2025
EditorialsNews

KERALA HIGH COURT GRANTS BAIL TO 91-YEAR-OLD MAN ACCUSED OF ATTACKING 88-YEAR-OLD WIFE OVER ALLEGED INFIDELITY

12/04/2025
Lawyer's ArcLawyer's Arc
© Lawyer's Arc 2020-2025. All Rights Reserved.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?