Background of the Case
Asaram Bapu, convicted in a 2013 rape case, had approached the Gujarat High Court seeking interim bail citing health concerns.
Contents
Incident Details
- The self-styled God-man sought bail, claiming his deteriorating health required medical attention outside the jail.
- The prosecution opposed the plea, arguing that his medical needs were adequately addressed within prison facilities.
High Court’s Legal Observations
The Gujarat High Court’s division bench delivered a split verdict on the matter, with one judge favouring bail and the other opposing it.
Key Court Findings
- One judge opined that Asaram’s health concerns warranted medical bail.
- The opposing judge maintained that no special treatment should be granted, given the gravity of the offense.
Court’s Directive
As the bench was divided, the matter has now been referred to the Chief Justice of the Gujarat High Court for further consideration.
Legal Significance of the Ruling
This case highlights the complexities in granting bail to high-profile convicts and the judicial process when benches disagree.
