By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Lawyer's ArcLawyer's ArcLawyer's Arc
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Opportunity
    • Paid Law Internships
    • Internships
    • Jobs
    • Events & Workshops
    • Moot Court
    • Call For Papers
  • Editorials
  • Case Analysis
  • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Disclaimer
    • Privacy Policy
    • Refund and Cancellation Policy
    • Terms of Service
  • Submit Blog
Reading: BOMBAY HIGH COURT DISMISSES PLEAS CHALLENGING CONSTRUCTION OF BAL THACKERAY MEMORIAL AT SHIVAJI PARK
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Font ResizerAa
Lawyer's ArcLawyer's Arc
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Case Analysis
  • Subject Notes
  • Jobs
  • Opportunity
  • Editorials
  • About Us
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Case Analysis
  • Subject Notes
    • LAW OF TORT
    • Constitution Law
    • CRIMINAL LAW
    • Family law
    • Contract Law
    • IPR
    • international law
    • Banking law
    • COMPANY LAW
    • CYBER LAW
    • Environmental law
  • Jobs
  • Opportunity
    • Internships
    • Paid Law Internships
    • Events & Workshops
  • Editorials
  • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Disclaimer
    • Privacy Policy
    • Refund and Cancellation Policy
    • Terms of Service
    • Submit Blog Post
Follow US
© Lawyer's Arc 2020-2025. All Rights Reserved.
Lawyer's Arc > BOMBAY HIGH COURT DISMISSES PLEAS CHALLENGING CONSTRUCTION OF BAL THACKERAY MEMORIAL AT SHIVAJI PARK

BOMBAY HIGH COURT DISMISSES PLEAS CHALLENGING CONSTRUCTION OF BAL THACKERAY MEMORIAL AT SHIVAJI PARK

Aaryansh Agrawal
Last updated: 01/07/2025 4:11 PM
Published 01/07/2025
Share
3 Min Read
From Google—Bombay High Court
SHARE

BOMBAY| 1ST JULY 2025– The Bombay High Court on Tuesday dismissed multiple petitions challenging the Maharashtra government’s decision to construct a memorial for late Shiv Sena founder Bal Thackeray at Shivaji Park, Dadar.

Background: PILs Against Conversion of Mayor Bungalow and Land Allotment

The public interest litigation (PIL) petitions were filed against the 2017 decision to convert an old mayoral bungalow at Shivaji Park into a memorial dedicated to Bal Thackeray.

-Story After Advertisement -

Petitioner Bhagwanji Riyani also challenged the allotment of an adjacent plot of land, claiming it was part of the ‘green zone’ under the city’s development plan.

BOMBAY HIGH COURT : BENCH COMPOSITION AND ORDER

A Bench comprising Chief Justice Alok Aradhe and Justice Sandeep Marne dismissed the petitions, thereby allowing the construction to proceed.

Challenge to ₹100 Crore Allocation and BMC Act Amendment

-Story After Advertisement -

The PILs further questioned the State government’s decision to allocate ₹100 crore for setting up the memorial.

Additionally, the petitioners assailed an amendment to the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, which allowed the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) to lease immovable property to any person for a nominal rate of ₹1 per annum.

The petitioners argued that such large public funds and resources should not be used for a memorial dedicated to a private individual, and could instead serve more pressing public needs.

-Story After Advertisement -

STATE’S RESPONSE: DISCRETIONARY POWER

The Maharashtra government defended its decision, asserting that it was within its discretion to allot land and allocate funds for constructing the memorial.

BMC AND MHCC: DUE PROCESS FOLLOWED

The Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) and the Mumbai Heritage Conservation Committee (MHCC) also defended the project, submitting that all legal procedures and requisite permissions had been followed.

In its affidavit, the BMC stated:

-Story After Advertisement -

“Due process of law had been followed before allotting land for the memorial in Mumbai at a nominal rate.”

The civic body informed the Court that in 2018, the Maharashtra government had sanctioned the conversion of the plot from ‘green zone’ to ‘residential zone’, in accordance with the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act (MRTP).

MHCC’S PERMISSION AND TIMELINE

The MHCC, in its affidavit, explained that it had been approached for a no-objection certificate (NOC) in May 2018 for the memorial construction, which was granted.

-Story After Advertisement -

Further, in July 2020, permission for constructing a museum and entrance block on the adjacent plot was also granted.

COURT’S CONCLUSION

After considering the submissions, the High Court found no merit in the petitions and dismissed them, thereby upholding the government’s plans for the Bal Thackeray memorial.


Related

You Might Also Like

PIL FILED IN BOMBAY HIGH COURT AGAINST PRADA FOR ALLEGED MISUSE OF KOLHAPURI CHAPPAL DESIGN

KERALA HIGH COURT EMPHASIZES REFORMATION OVER PUNISHMENT IN CRIMINAL JUSTICE: JUSTICE PV KUNHIKRISHNAN’S KEY OBSERVATIONS

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT SEEKS DETAILED REPORT FROM WEST BENGAL GOVT ON GANG RAPE OF LAW STUDENT AT SOUTH KOLKATA LAW COLLEGE

KERALA HIGH COURT GRANTS ANTICIPATORY BAIL TO MAN ACCUSED OF RAPE, OBSERVES PRIMA FACIE CONSENT IN RELATIONSHIP

DELHI HIGH COURT STAYS $39 MILLION DAMAGES ORDER AGAINST AMAZON IN BEVERLY HILLS POLO CLUB TRADEMARK DISPUTE

Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Share

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
YoutubeSubscribe
TelegramFollow

Join Telegram Channel

Join Whatsapp Channel

- Advertisement -
Lawyer's Arc Logo

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
[mc4wp_form]
Popular News
LAW OF TORT

False Imprisonment and Malicious Prosecution Under Tort

LA | Admin
LA | Admin
18/03/2024
Internship Opportunity at Lawyer’s Arc
Right to Freedom of Religion (Articles 25-28)
Advocates (Amendment) Bill, 2025 : The Future of Advocacy in India
Download AIBE 19 Result Live : How & Where to Download Result Aibe XIX
- Advertisement -
Submit Post LAwyer's ArcSubmit Post LAwyer's Arc
- Advertisement -
Archives
False Imprisonment and Malicious Prosecution Under Tort
18/03/2024
Lawyer's Arc Internship
Internship Opportunity at Lawyer’s Arc
23/04/2025
Right to Freedom of Religion (Articles 25-28)
18/03/2024
Advocates Amendment Bill
Advocates (Amendment) Bill, 2025 : The Future of Advocacy in India
22/02/2025
AIBE 19 RESULT DOWNLOAD
Download AIBE 19 Result Live : How & Where to Download Result Aibe XIX
23/03/2025

You Might Also Like

CAT SETS ASIDE SUSPENSION OF ACP VIKASH KUMAR VIKASH IN CHINNASWAMY STADIUM STAMPEDE CASE

01/07/2025

KERALA HIGH COURT SLAMS CBFC FOR OBJECTING TO MOVIE TITLE “JANAKI V STATE OF KERALA”

30/06/2025

SUPREME COURT ALLOWS LALIT MODI TO APPROACH CIVIL COURT IN PLEA AGAINST BCCI OVER ED PENALTY

30/06/2025

BCI CONSIDERING ACTION AGAINST SILF FOR “MISLEADING” COMMENTS ON ENTRY OF FOREIGN LAW FIRMS

30/06/2025
Lawyer's ArcLawyer's Arc
© Lawyer's Arc 2020-2025. All Rights Reserved.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?