By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Lawyer's ArcLawyer's ArcLawyer's Arc
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Opportunity
    • Paid Law Internships
    • Internships
    • Jobs
    • Events & Workshops
    • Moot Court
    • Call For Papers
  • Editorials
  • Case Analysis
  • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Disclaimer
    • Privacy Policy
    • Refund and Cancellation Policy
    • Terms of Service
  • Submit Blog
Reading: BOMBAY HIGH COURT SEEKS CBFC REPLY ON DELAY IN CERTIFYING FILM ON YOGI ADITYANATH: ‘AJEY: THE UNTOLD STORY OF A YOGI’
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Font ResizerAa
Lawyer's ArcLawyer's Arc
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Case Analysis
  • Subject Notes
  • Jobs
  • Opportunity
  • Editorials
  • About Us
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Case Analysis
  • Subject Notes
    • LAW OF TORT
    • Constitution Law
    • CRIMINAL LAW
    • Family law
    • Contract Law
    • IPR
    • international law
    • Banking law
    • COMPANY LAW
    • CYBER LAW
    • Environmental law
  • Jobs
  • Opportunity
    • Internships
    • Paid Law Internships
    • Events & Workshops
  • Editorials
  • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Disclaimer
    • Privacy Policy
    • Refund and Cancellation Policy
    • Terms of Service
    • Submit Blog Post
Follow US
© Lawyer's Arc 2020-2025. All Rights Reserved.
Lawyer's Arc > BOMBAY HIGH COURT SEEKS CBFC REPLY ON DELAY IN CERTIFYING FILM ON YOGI ADITYANATH: ‘AJEY: THE UNTOLD STORY OF A YOGI’

BOMBAY HIGH COURT SEEKS CBFC REPLY ON DELAY IN CERTIFYING FILM ON YOGI ADITYANATH: ‘AJEY: THE UNTOLD STORY OF A YOGI’

Aaryansh Agrawal
Last updated: 15/07/2025 8:58 PM
Published 15/07/2025
Share
5 Min Read
From Google—Bombay High Court
SHARE

BOMBAY | 15TH JULY 2025 – The Bombay High Court on Tuesday sought a response from the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) to a petition filed by Samrat Cinematics India Pvt. Ltd., the makers of the upcoming film ‘Ajey: The Untold Story of a Yogi’, who have alleged delays by the CBFC in certifying the film for release.

The film, inspired by Shantanu Gupta’s book ‘The Monk Who Became Chief Minister’, is purportedly based on Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath’s life and was scheduled for theatrical release on August 1, 2025.

COURT ISSUES NOTICE TO CBFC

A Bench of Justices Revati Mohite Dere and Neela Gokhale issued a notice to the CBFC after its official sought time to engage counsel. The matter is set for further hearing on July 17.

-Story After Advertisement -

The Court also orally observed that the CBFC is required to issue certifications within the timelines prescribed by law and cannot “shy away” from that obligation.

ALLEGATIONS AGAINST CBFC

According to the petition filed by Samrat Cinematics India Pvt. Ltd., there has been an “arbitrary and unexplained delay” by the CBFC in processing the certification applications for the film, its teaser, trailer, and promotional song, despite the film’s scheduled release on August 1.

The filmmakers stated that they first applied for certification of the main film on June 5, 2025. Under Rule 37 of the Cinematograph (Certification) Rules, 2024, the CBFC is required to scrutinize applications within 7 days and refer the film for screening within 15 days. However, no action was taken for nearly a month.

-Story After Advertisement -

On July 3, the petitioners reapplied under the priority scheme, paying three times the standard fee as per Rule 33(2), following advice from CBFC officials. A screening scheduled for July 7 was abruptly cancelled on July 6, without any explanation.

When they checked the status on July 12, the application was marked as “Incomplete”, with a vague instruction to “Provide Documentary Evidence”, but no specific details were provided.

OBJECTION TO NOC REQUIREMENT

The filmmakers have strongly objected to the CBFC’s alleged insistence on a No Objection Certificate (NOC) from the Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister’s Office.

-Story After Advertisement -

The petition argues:

“It is pertinent to note that such an erroneous requirement / request is not only extremely prejudicial to the professional interests of the Petitioner but also detrimental to its financial interests. Further, an irrational, unreasonable and illegal demand / requirement being put forward by CBFC for obtaining a NOC from the CMO’s office is nothing but a ploy to delay the release of the motion picture ‘Ajey’, that too when the same is due for theatrical release on August 1st, 2025.”

FINANCIAL AND REPUTATIONAL DAMAGE

The petitioners highlighted that they have already incurred pre-release expenses of approximately ₹30 crore, with an additional ₹10 crore expected before release. Several promotional campaigns had to be altered or cancelled, leading to significant financial loss and reduced marketing impact.

-Story After Advertisement -

The film, which is based on ‘The Monk Who Became Chief Minister’, a book published in 2017 and available in twelve languages, has received official endorsement from the Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister’s Office. The petition claims that the film offers a respectful and factual portrayal of Yogi Adityanath’s leadership journey.

CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS VIOLATED

The filmmakers argued that CBFC’s conduct violates their fundamental rights under Articles 14, 19(1)(a), 19(1)(g), and 21 of the Constitution of India.

They urged the Court to direct the CBFC to certify the film and related materials within five days under the priority scheme and to immediately schedule the film’s screening.

-Story After Advertisement -

LEGAL REPRESENTATION

Senior Advocate Ravi Kadam, along with advocates Satatya Anand, Nikhil Aradhe, Aakash Sinha, Arjun Aggarwal, and Vrinda Bagaria, appeared for Samrat Cinematics India Pvt. Ltd.


Related

You Might Also Like

SUPREME COURT STRESSES NEED FOR BALANCED GUIDELINES ON ONLINE SPEECH: “MANY FREE ADVISORS IN THE MARKET”

RAHUL GANDHI GRANTED BAIL BY LUCKNOW COURT IN ARMY DEFAMATION CASE: NEXT HEARING ON AUGUST 13

“INFLAMMATORY”: SUPREME COURT SLAMS CARTOONIST HEMANT MALVIYA’S CARICATURE ABOUT PM MODI, RSS

GUJARAT HIGH COURT FINES MAN ₹1 LAKH FOR ATTENDING VIRTUAL HEARING FROM TOILET; CONSIDERS JAIL

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT: SENDING FOUL TEXT MESSAGES DOES NOT AMOUNT TO STALKING UNDER IPC

Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Share

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
YoutubeSubscribe
TelegramFollow

Join Telegram Channel

Join Whatsapp Channel

- Advertisement -
Lawyer's Arc Logo

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
[mc4wp_form]
Popular News
LAW OF TORT

False Imprisonment and Malicious Prosecution Under Tort

LA | Admin
LA | Admin
18/03/2024
Internship Opportunity at Lawyer’s Arc
Right to Freedom of Religion (Articles 25-28)
Advocates (Amendment) Bill, 2025 : The Future of Advocacy in India
Download AIBE 19 Result Live : How & Where to Download Result Aibe XIX
- Advertisement -
Submit Post LAwyer's ArcSubmit Post LAwyer's Arc
- Advertisement -
Archives
False Imprisonment and Malicious Prosecution Under Tort
18/03/2024
Lawyer's Arc Internship
Internship Opportunity at Lawyer’s Arc
23/04/2025
Right to Freedom of Religion (Articles 25-28)
18/03/2024
Advocates Amendment Bill
Advocates (Amendment) Bill, 2025 : The Future of Advocacy in India
22/02/2025
AIBE 19 RESULT DOWNLOAD
Download AIBE 19 Result Live : How & Where to Download Result Aibe XIX
23/03/2025

You Might Also Like

KERALA HIGH COURT: LACK OF GOVERNMENT SANCTION NO GROUND TO LET POLICE ESCAPE CUSTODIAL TORTURE CHARGES

10/07/2025

SOUTH KOLKATA LAW COLLEGE RAPE VICTIM TELLS CALCUTTA HIGH COURT SHE IS SATISFIED WITH POLICE PROBE

10/07/2025

SUPREME COURT URGES ECI TO CONSIDER AADHAAR, RATION CARD, EPIC AS VALID VOTER ID DOCUMENTS IN BIHAR SIR 1

10/07/2025

DELHI HIGH COURT RULES BOTH PERU AND CHILE HAVE RIGHTS OVER PISCO, REQUIRES GEOGRAPHIC PREFIX TO AVOID CONFUSION

08/07/2025
Lawyer's ArcLawyer's Arc
© Lawyer's Arc 2020-2025. All Rights Reserved.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?