By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Lawyer's ArcLawyer's ArcLawyer's Arc
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Opportunity
    • Paid Law Internships
    • Internships
    • Jobs
    • Events & Workshops
    • Moot Court
    • Call For Papers
  • Editorials
  • Case Analysis
  • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Disclaimer
    • Privacy Policy
    • Refund and Cancellation Policy
    • Terms of Service
  • Submit Blog
Reading: DELHI HIGH COURT SLAMS DPS DWARKA FOR USING BOUNCERS TO BLOCK STUDENTS OVER FEE DISPUTE (JUNE 4)
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Font ResizerAa
Lawyer's ArcLawyer's Arc
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Case Analysis
  • Subject Notes
  • Jobs
  • Opportunity
  • Editorials
  • About Us
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Case Analysis
  • Subject Notes
    • LAW OF TORT
    • Constitution Law
    • CRIMINAL LAW
    • Family law
    • Contract Law
    • IPR
    • international law
    • Banking law
    • COMPANY LAW
    • CYBER LAW
    • Environmental law
  • Jobs
  • Opportunity
    • Internships
    • Paid Law Internships
    • Events & Workshops
  • Editorials
  • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Disclaimer
    • Privacy Policy
    • Refund and Cancellation Policy
    • Terms of Service
    • Submit Blog Post
Follow US
© Lawyer's Arc 2020-2025. All Rights Reserved.
Lawyer's Arc > DELHI HIGH COURT SLAMS DPS DWARKA FOR USING BOUNCERS TO BLOCK STUDENTS OVER FEE DISPUTE (JUNE 4)

DELHI HIGH COURT SLAMS DPS DWARKA FOR USING BOUNCERS TO BLOCK STUDENTS OVER FEE DISPUTE (JUNE 4)

Aaryansh Agrawal
Last updated: 10/06/2025 10:30 PM
Published 10/06/2025
Share
5 Min Read
Delhi High Court
SHARE

NEW DELHI| 4TH JUNE 2025

In a strongly worded judgment, the Delhi High Court on Thursday condemned Delhi Public School (DPS), Dwarka for allegedly deploying bouncers to prevent students from entering school premises due to non-payment of academic fees. The Court observed that such actions amount to mental harassment and severely impact the psychological well-being of children.

COURT LABELS ACTION AS “REPREHENSIBLE”

Justice Sachin Datta, while hearing an application filed by parents of 32 (later clarified to 31) students allegedly expelled from the school, expressed dismay at DPS Dwarka’s alleged conduct.

-Story After Advertisement -

“Such a reprehensible practice has no place in an institute of learning. It reflects not only disregard to the dignity of a child but also fundamental misunderstanding of a school’s role in the society. Public shaming/intimidation of a student on account of financial default, especially through force or coercive action, not only constitutes mental harassment but also undermines the psychological well being and self-worth of a child. The use of ‘bouncers’ fosters a climate of fear, humiliation and exclusion that is incompatible with the fundamental ethos of a school.”

Schools Are Not Pure Commercial Entities, Says Court

Emphasizing the societal role of educational institutions, Justice Datta added:

-Story After Advertisement -

“A school though charges fees for the services rendered, cannot be equated with a pure commercial establishment. The driving force and character of a school (particularly a school such as the petitioner, which is run by a pre-eminent society) is rooted not in profit maximisation but in public welfare, nation building and the holistic development of children. The primary objective of a school is to impart education and inculcate values, not to operate as a business enterprise.”

BACKGROUND OF THE CASE

The issue arose from claims made by parents that DPS Dwarka expelled students over non-payment of fees, and even used bouncers to block entry. The parents alleged:

Students were confined to the library and publicly named over unpaid fees.

-Story After Advertisement -

In one shocking incident, a girl was denied menstrual hygiene assistance because her fee was pending.

Despite submitting cheques as per government-approved fee structures, the school did not encash them.

Earlier High Court Orders

-Story After Advertisement -

On May 16, a co-ordinate bench of the Delhi High Court ordered that the affected students be reinstated upon payment of 50% of the hiked fee.

Following this, DPS issued a notification on June 4 reinstating the students, contingent on compliance with the court’s fee payment directive.

During the June 5 hearing, Justice Datta noted:

-Story After Advertisement -

“Since the impugned order/s whereby the name of 31 children had been struck off the rolls of the school, has been withdrawn and the concerned students have been reinstated, the controversy raised in the present application has become moot.”

COURT REITERATES FIDUCIARY DUTY OF SCHOOLS

The judgment further highlighted that schools, while entitled to collect fees, are entrusted with fiduciary and moral responsibilities.

“The school, no doubt, is entitled to charge appropriate fees, especially given the financial outlay required to sustain infrastructure, remunerate staff and provide a conducive learning environment. However, the school is different from a normal commercial establishment, inasmuch as it carries with it fiduciary and moral responsibilities towards its students.”

The Court also reminded parents of their obligation to comply with the High Court’s previous orders on fee payment.

HOPE FOR MUTUAL COOPERATION

In conclusion, Justice Datta expressed hope that both school authorities and parents would cooperate:

“The school as well as the parents will act with circumspection and cooperate with each other with a view to advance the interest of the concerned students.”

PARTIES AND LEGAL REPRESENTATION

DPS Dwarka was represented by Senior Advocates Pinaki Misra and Puneet Mittal, along with Advocates Bhuvan Gugnani, Sakshi Mendiratta, and Nupur Mantoo.

The parents were represented by Advocates Manoj K. Sharma, Manish Gupta, Vivek Chandrasekhar, Akanchha Jhunjhunwala, Deepti Verma, and Sandeep Gupta.

NCPCR was represented by Advocates Abhaid Parikh, Rishabh Dubey, and Garima Sardana.

Department of Education was represented by Standing Counsel Sameer Vashishtha with Advocate Avni Singh.

Delhi Police was represented by Senior Panel Counsel Satya Ranjan Swain and Panel Counsel Kautilya Birat.

Read More: https://www.lawyersarc.com/news/schools-arent-just-business-enterprises-cant-intimidate-students-for-not-paying-fees-delhi-high-court

Related

You Might Also Like

AAI TO FLOAT TENDER TO REPLACE ÇELEBI AT CHENNAI AIRPORT AMID ONGOING LITIGATION (7TH JUNE)

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT HIGHLIGHTS LEGAL GAPS IN MENTAL HEALTHCARE ACT, 2017; ALLOWS NEPHEW TO REPRESENT MENTALLY ILL AUNT

SUPREME COURT: HIGH COURT CANNOT ASSESS MERITS OF CHARGES UNDER SECTION 482 CRPC WHILE QUASHING FIR

J&K AND LADAKH HIGH COURT: NO FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO TRADE IN LIQUOR, LICENSE FEE HIKE JUSTIFIED (6th JUNE 2025)

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT GRANTS RELIEF TO BBC JOURNALIST MOHAMMAD SERAJ ALI IN PASSPORT NOC CASE (6TH JUNE 2025)

Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Share

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
YoutubeSubscribe
TelegramFollow

Join Telegram Channel

Join Whatsapp Channel

- Advertisement -
Lawyer's Arc Logo

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
[mc4wp_form]
Popular News
LAW OF TORT

False Imprisonment and Malicious Prosecution Under Tort

LA | Admin
LA | Admin
18/03/2024
Internship Opportunity at Lawyer’s Arc
Right to Freedom of Religion (Articles 25-28)
Advocates (Amendment) Bill, 2025 : The Future of Advocacy in India
Download AIBE 19 Result Live : How & Where to Download Result Aibe XIX
- Advertisement -
Submit Post LAwyer's ArcSubmit Post LAwyer's Arc
- Advertisement -
Archives
False Imprisonment and Malicious Prosecution Under Tort
18/03/2024
Lawyer's Arc Internship
Internship Opportunity at Lawyer’s Arc
23/04/2025
Right to Freedom of Religion (Articles 25-28)
18/03/2024
Advocates Amendment Bill
Advocates (Amendment) Bill, 2025 : The Future of Advocacy in India
22/02/2025
AIBE 19 RESULT DOWNLOAD
Download AIBE 19 Result Live : How & Where to Download Result Aibe XIX
23/03/2025

You Might Also Like

SUPREME COURT CANCELS BAIL OF KARNATAKA CONGRESS MLA VINAY KULKARNI IN 2016 BJP WORKER MURDER CASE

11/06/2025

ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE IS SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC JUSTICE: JUSTICE ABHAY S OKA ON WORLD ENVIRONMENT DAY (5TH JUNE)

11/06/2025

KERALA HIGH COURT: MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE CAUSING DEATH NOT ALWAYS CULPABLE HOMICIDE UNDER IPC SECTION 304

11/06/2025

SUPREME COURT SLAMS KERALA FOR MISUSE OF PREVENTIVE DETENTION AFTER BAIL GRANT (5th JUNE)

11/06/2025
Lawyer's ArcLawyer's Arc
© Lawyer's Arc 2020-2025. All Rights Reserved.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?