By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Lawyer's ArcLawyer's ArcLawyer's Arc
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Opportunity
    • Paid Law Internships
    • Internships
    • Jobs
    • Events & Workshops
    • Moot Court
    • Call For Papers
  • Editorials
  • Case Analysis
  • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Disclaimer
    • Privacy Policy
    • Refund and Cancellation Policy
    • Terms of Service
  • Submit Blog
Reading: HAGUE COURT OF ARBITRATION RULES ON INDUS WATER TREATY DISPUTE DESPITE INDIA’S ABEYANCE CLAIM
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Font ResizerAa
Lawyer's ArcLawyer's Arc
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Case Analysis
  • Subject Notes
  • Jobs
  • Opportunity
  • Editorials
  • About Us
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Case Analysis
  • Subject Notes
    • LAW OF TORT
    • Constitution Law
    • CRIMINAL LAW
    • Family law
    • Contract Law
    • IPR
    • international law
    • Banking law
    • COMPANY LAW
    • CYBER LAW
    • Environmental law
  • Jobs
  • Opportunity
    • Internships
    • Paid Law Internships
    • Events & Workshops
  • Editorials
  • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Disclaimer
    • Privacy Policy
    • Refund and Cancellation Policy
    • Terms of Service
    • Submit Blog Post
Follow US
© Lawyer's Arc 2020-2025. All Rights Reserved.
Lawyer's Arc > HAGUE COURT OF ARBITRATION RULES ON INDUS WATER TREATY DISPUTE DESPITE INDIA’S ABEYANCE CLAIM

HAGUE COURT OF ARBITRATION RULES ON INDUS WATER TREATY DISPUTE DESPITE INDIA’S ABEYANCE CLAIM

Aaryansh Agrawal
Last updated: 06/07/2025 6:08 PM
Published 06/07/2025
Share
5 Min Read
Image Source: From Google Hague
SHARE

HAGUE | 6TH JULY 2025 – A Court of Arbitration (CoA) under the aegis of the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) at The Hague recently ruled that it has jurisdiction to arbitrate Pakistan’s concerns over India’s hydroelectric power projects on the Indus River system. This ruling came even after India placed the Indus Water Treaty (IWT) in abeyance earlier this year following the Pahalgam terror attack.

INDIA REJECTS RULING, PAKISTAN WELCOMES DECISION

India has strongly rejected the CoA’s decision, reiterating that it does not recognize the arbitral body. Meanwhile, Pakistan has welcomed the ruling and called on India to resume the normal functioning of the IWT.

BACKGROUND: WHY WAS THE COA ESTABLISHED?

The dispute centers around India’s construction of the Kishanganga and Ratle hydroelectric projects. Under the 1960 Indus Water Treaty, brokered by the World Bank, water sharing between India and Pakistan is regulated. The treaty provides for dispute resolution through bilateral talks, neutral expert intervention, or, ultimately, arbitration via a CoA.

-Story After Advertisement -

In 2016, Pakistan formally requested the formation of a CoA, alleging that India’s projects violated treaty terms by affecting downstream flows. India objected, insisting that the matter should be handled by a neutral expert, and called the CoA “illegal,” arguing that simultaneous proceedings under different mechanisms would breach the Treaty.

Despite India’s objections and boycott of the proceedings, the PCA moved forward, and in July 2023, ruled that it had jurisdiction over the dispute.

WHAT DID THE COA RULE RECENTLY?

After the Pahalgam terror attack, India placed the IWT in abeyance. In a supplemental award dated June 27, the CoA addressed the impact of this decision on its jurisdiction.

-Story After Advertisement -

The CoA unanimously ruled that India’s stance does not affect its competence to hear the case.

“Rather, the Treaty provides for its continuation in force until terminated by mutual consent by India and Pakistan. Such text definitively indicates an intent by the drafters not to allow for unilateral action to alter the rights, obligations, and procedures established by the Treaty, including the Treaty’s dispute settlement procedures,” the Court said.

The CoA further stated that, under customary international law, events occurring after proceedings are initiated do not affect jurisdiction.

-Story After Advertisement -

“[The CoA] FINDS that the Court of Arbitration has a continuing responsibility to advance its proceedings in a timely, efficient, and fair manner without regard to India’s position on ‘abeyance’, and that a failure to do so would be inconsistent with its obligations under the Treaty.”

HOW DID INDIA REACT?

India’s Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) rejected the ruling outright:

“…consequently any proceedings before this forum and any award or decision taken by it are also for that reason illegal and per se void,” the MEA said.

-Story After Advertisement -

India argued that placing the Treaty in abeyance was an exercise of its sovereign rights:

“This latest charade at Pakistan’s behest is yet another desperate attempt by it to escape accountability for its role as the global epicenter of terrorism. Pakistan’s resort to this fabricated arbitration mechanism is consistent with its decades-long pattern of deception and manipulation of international forums.”

HOW DID PAKISTAN REACT?

Pakistan’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs welcomed the award, describing it as a vindication of its stance that the IWT remains valid and cannot be suspended unilaterally.

-Story After Advertisement -

“We urge India to immediately resume the normal functioning of the Indus Waters Treaty, and fulfil its treaty obligations, wholly and faithfully,” Pakistan said.

WHAT HAPPENS NEXT?

Pakistan has expressed willingness to engage with India on all outstanding issues, including Jammu & Kashmir, the IWT, trade, and counterterrorism. However, India has stated it will keep the Treaty suspended until Pakistan “irrevocably abjures its support for cross-border terrorism.”

The CoA will now examine the core issues concerning India’s construction of the two hydropower projects on the Indus River. Nevertheless, even if the CoA rules in Pakistan’s favor, India is unlikely to comply, given its longstanding position questioning the legality of the arbitration process.


Related

You Might Also Like

SWAGATH DELHI MOVES DELHI HIGH COURT AGAINST TELANGANA-BASED HOTEL SWAGATH FOR TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT

ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT DIRECTS MAGISTRATES TO STRICTLY FOLLOW SUPREME COURT GUIDELINES IN SOCIAL MEDIA CASES

PIL FILED IN BOMBAY HIGH COURT AGAINST PRADA FOR ALLEGED MISUSE OF KOLHAPURI CHAPPAL DESIGN

KERALA HIGH COURT EMPHASIZES REFORMATION OVER PUNISHMENT IN CRIMINAL JUSTICE: JUSTICE PV KUNHIKRISHNAN’S KEY OBSERVATIONS

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT SEEKS DETAILED REPORT FROM WEST BENGAL GOVT ON GANG RAPE OF LAW STUDENT AT SOUTH KOLKATA LAW COLLEGE

Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Share

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
YoutubeSubscribe
TelegramFollow

Join Telegram Channel

Join Whatsapp Channel

- Advertisement -
Lawyer's Arc Logo

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
[mc4wp_form]
Popular News
LAW OF TORT

False Imprisonment and Malicious Prosecution Under Tort

LA | Admin
LA | Admin
18/03/2024
Internship Opportunity at Lawyer’s Arc
Right to Freedom of Religion (Articles 25-28)
Advocates (Amendment) Bill, 2025 : The Future of Advocacy in India
Download AIBE 19 Result Live : How & Where to Download Result Aibe XIX
- Advertisement -
Submit Post LAwyer's ArcSubmit Post LAwyer's Arc
- Advertisement -
Archives
False Imprisonment and Malicious Prosecution Under Tort
18/03/2024
Lawyer's Arc Internship
Internship Opportunity at Lawyer’s Arc
23/04/2025
Right to Freedom of Religion (Articles 25-28)
18/03/2024
Advocates Amendment Bill
Advocates (Amendment) Bill, 2025 : The Future of Advocacy in India
22/02/2025
AIBE 19 RESULT DOWNLOAD
Download AIBE 19 Result Live : How & Where to Download Result Aibe XIX
23/03/2025

You Might Also Like

KERALA HIGH COURT GRANTS ANTICIPATORY BAIL TO MAN ACCUSED OF RAPE, OBSERVES PRIMA FACIE CONSENT IN RELATIONSHIP

03/07/2025

DELHI HIGH COURT STAYS $39 MILLION DAMAGES ORDER AGAINST AMAZON IN BEVERLY HILLS POLO CLUB TRADEMARK DISPUTE

01/07/2025

BOMBAY HIGH COURT DISMISSES PLEAS CHALLENGING CONSTRUCTION OF BAL THACKERAY MEMORIAL AT SHIVAJI PARK

01/07/2025

CAT SETS ASIDE SUSPENSION OF ACP VIKASH KUMAR VIKASH IN CHINNASWAMY STADIUM STAMPEDE CASE

01/07/2025
Lawyer's ArcLawyer's Arc
© Lawyer's Arc 2020-2025. All Rights Reserved.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?