By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Lawyer's ArcLawyer's ArcLawyer's Arc
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Opportunity
    • Paid Law Internships
    • Internships
    • Jobs
    • Events & Workshops
    • Moot Court
    • Call For Papers
  • Editorials
  • Case Analysis
  • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Disclaimer
    • Privacy Policy
    • Refund and Cancellation Policy
    • Terms of Service
  • Submit Blog
Reading: PIL FILED IN BOMBAY HIGH COURT AGAINST PRADA FOR ALLEGED MISUSE OF KOLHAPURI CHAPPAL DESIGN
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Font ResizerAa
Lawyer's ArcLawyer's Arc
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Case Analysis
  • Subject Notes
  • Jobs
  • Opportunity
  • Editorials
  • About Us
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Case Analysis
  • Subject Notes
    • LAW OF TORT
    • Constitution Law
    • CRIMINAL LAW
    • Family law
    • Contract Law
    • IPR
    • international law
    • Banking law
    • COMPANY LAW
    • CYBER LAW
    • Environmental law
  • Jobs
  • Opportunity
    • Internships
    • Paid Law Internships
    • Events & Workshops
  • Editorials
  • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Disclaimer
    • Privacy Policy
    • Refund and Cancellation Policy
    • Terms of Service
    • Submit Blog Post
Follow US
© Lawyer's Arc 2020-2025. All Rights Reserved.
Lawyer's Arc > PIL FILED IN BOMBAY HIGH COURT AGAINST PRADA FOR ALLEGED MISUSE OF KOLHAPURI CHAPPAL DESIGN

PIL FILED IN BOMBAY HIGH COURT AGAINST PRADA FOR ALLEGED MISUSE OF KOLHAPURI CHAPPAL DESIGN

Aaryansh Agrawal
Last updated: 04/07/2025 6:58 PM
Published 04/07/2025
Share
4 Min Read
From Google—Bombay High Court
SHARE

BOMBAY | 4TH JULY 2025– A public interest litigation (PIL) has been filed before the Bombay High Court seeking action against global fashion giant Prada for allegedly using a design deceptively similar to Maharashtra’s iconic Kolhapuri Chappal without authorization.

PRADA’S ALLEGED CULTURAL MISAPPROPRIATION

According to the PIL, Prada showcased “toe ring sandals” during its Spring/Summer 2026 Men’s Collection at a fashion show in Milan on June 22. The footwear reportedly closely resembles the traditional Kolhapuri Chappal, a handcrafted product deeply rooted in Maharashtra’s artisan culture.

Filed by five advocates, the PIL argues that Prada’s act constitutes cultural misappropriation and violates the rights of the artisan communities historically associated with Kolhapuri Chappals.

-Story After Advertisement -

“This action of PRADA infringes the fundamental right to life (Article 21), which includes the right to livelihood and cultural identity of the Kolhapuri Chappal artisan communities,” the plea states.

GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATION STATUS OF KOLHAPURI CHAPPALS

The Kolhapuri Chappal is a Geographical Indication (GI) Tagged product, officially granted GI status on May 4, 2009, under Application No 169 in Class 25 (Footwear). It was renewed in 2019 and is valid until 2029.

Describing its significance, the plea mentions:

-Story After Advertisement -

“Handcrafted footwear, produced using traditional methods passed down over generations in the region of Maharashtra.”

The PIL highlights that making a pair of Kolhapuri Chappals involves specialized skills and a time-intensive process, often taking four to five weeks to complete each pair. The footwear reflects countless hours of meticulous labor by artisans who have preserved this traditional art form for nearly 800 years.

VIOLATION OF RIGHTS AND CULTURAL IDENTITY

The petitioners allege that Prada’s designers failed to acknowledge the Indian origins of the footwear and did not credit the artisans who have been creating them for generations. Instead, Prada sold the sandals under its brand name, reportedly priced at over ₹1 lakh per pair.

-Story After Advertisement -

“Traditional knowledge, skills, and craftsmanship involved in the making of Kolhapuri chappals constitute intangible cultural assets of the artisan communities of Maharashtra, which cannot lawfully be used, copied or commercialized by third parties without the consent or authorization of the rightful custodians,” the petitioners have submitted.

The plea further invokes Section 22 of the Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999, arguing that Prada’s actions:

“Undermine the moral and economic rights of the artisans, erodes the cultural identity embedded in the craft and contravenes the objectives of Section 22.”

-Story After Advertisement -

Additionally, the plea asserts that Prada’s act infringes Article 29(1) of the Indian Constitution, which guarantees the right of any section of citizens to conserve their distinct culture.

RELIEFS SOUGHT BY PETITIONERS

The petitioners have sought:

Directions to restrain Prada from further commercializing and using the Kolhapuri Chappal design.

-Story After Advertisement -

A public apology from Prada.

Compensation to be awarded to artisan communities for reputational and economic losses incurred.

Directions to the government to frame transparent and appropriate guidelines and constitute a committee for the protection of GI-registered products in international markets.

IMPORTANCE OF PROTECTING ARTISAN RIGHTS

According to the plea, the misappropriation of traditional crafts like the Kolhapuri Chappal directly threatens the livelihood, dignity, and cultural identity of local artisan communities. The petitioners argue that international fashion houses must respect the intellectual and cultural property of indigenous communities, rather than exploiting it for commercial gain.



Related

You Might Also Like

KERALA HIGH COURT EMPHASIZES REFORMATION OVER PUNISHMENT IN CRIMINAL JUSTICE: JUSTICE PV KUNHIKRISHNAN’S KEY OBSERVATIONS

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT SEEKS DETAILED REPORT FROM WEST BENGAL GOVT ON GANG RAPE OF LAW STUDENT AT SOUTH KOLKATA LAW COLLEGE

KERALA HIGH COURT GRANTS ANTICIPATORY BAIL TO MAN ACCUSED OF RAPE, OBSERVES PRIMA FACIE CONSENT IN RELATIONSHIP

DELHI HIGH COURT STAYS $39 MILLION DAMAGES ORDER AGAINST AMAZON IN BEVERLY HILLS POLO CLUB TRADEMARK DISPUTE

BOMBAY HIGH COURT DISMISSES PLEAS CHALLENGING CONSTRUCTION OF BAL THACKERAY MEMORIAL AT SHIVAJI PARK

Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Share

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
YoutubeSubscribe
TelegramFollow

Join Telegram Channel

Join Whatsapp Channel

- Advertisement -
Lawyer's Arc Logo

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
[mc4wp_form]
Popular News
LAW OF TORT

False Imprisonment and Malicious Prosecution Under Tort

LA | Admin
LA | Admin
18/03/2024
Internship Opportunity at Lawyer’s Arc
Right to Freedom of Religion (Articles 25-28)
Advocates (Amendment) Bill, 2025 : The Future of Advocacy in India
Download AIBE 19 Result Live : How & Where to Download Result Aibe XIX
- Advertisement -
Submit Post LAwyer's ArcSubmit Post LAwyer's Arc
- Advertisement -
Archives
False Imprisonment and Malicious Prosecution Under Tort
18/03/2024
Lawyer's Arc Internship
Internship Opportunity at Lawyer’s Arc
23/04/2025
Right to Freedom of Religion (Articles 25-28)
18/03/2024
Advocates Amendment Bill
Advocates (Amendment) Bill, 2025 : The Future of Advocacy in India
22/02/2025
AIBE 19 RESULT DOWNLOAD
Download AIBE 19 Result Live : How & Where to Download Result Aibe XIX
23/03/2025

You Might Also Like

CAT SETS ASIDE SUSPENSION OF ACP VIKASH KUMAR VIKASH IN CHINNASWAMY STADIUM STAMPEDE CASE

01/07/2025

KERALA HIGH COURT SLAMS CBFC FOR OBJECTING TO MOVIE TITLE “JANAKI V STATE OF KERALA”

30/06/2025

SUPREME COURT ALLOWS LALIT MODI TO APPROACH CIVIL COURT IN PLEA AGAINST BCCI OVER ED PENALTY

30/06/2025

BCI CONSIDERING ACTION AGAINST SILF FOR “MISLEADING” COMMENTS ON ENTRY OF FOREIGN LAW FIRMS

30/06/2025
Lawyer's ArcLawyer's Arc
© Lawyer's Arc 2020-2025. All Rights Reserved.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?