By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Lawyer's ArcLawyer's ArcLawyer's Arc
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Opportunity
    • Paid Law Internships
    • Internships
    • Jobs
    • Events & Workshops
    • Moot Court
    • Call For Papers
  • Editorials
  • Case Analysis
  • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Disclaimer
    • Privacy Policy
    • Refund and Cancellation Policy
    • Terms of Service
  • Submit Blog
Reading: RAHUL GANDHI GRANTED BAIL BY LUCKNOW COURT IN ARMY DEFAMATION CASE: NEXT HEARING ON AUGUST 13
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Font ResizerAa
Lawyer's ArcLawyer's Arc
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Case Analysis
  • Subject Notes
  • Jobs
  • Opportunity
  • Editorials
  • About Us
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Case Analysis
  • Subject Notes
    • LAW OF TORT
    • Constitution Law
    • CRIMINAL LAW
    • Family law
    • Contract Law
    • IPR
    • international law
    • Banking law
    • COMPANY LAW
    • CYBER LAW
    • Environmental law
  • Jobs
  • Opportunity
    • Internships
    • Paid Law Internships
    • Events & Workshops
  • Editorials
  • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Disclaimer
    • Privacy Policy
    • Refund and Cancellation Policy
    • Terms of Service
    • Submit Blog Post
Follow US
© Lawyer's Arc 2020-2025. All Rights Reserved.
Lawyer's Arc > RAHUL GANDHI GRANTED BAIL BY LUCKNOW COURT IN ARMY DEFAMATION CASE: NEXT HEARING ON AUGUST 13

RAHUL GANDHI GRANTED BAIL BY LUCKNOW COURT IN ARMY DEFAMATION CASE: NEXT HEARING ON AUGUST 13

Aaryansh Agrawal
Last updated: 15/07/2025 8:46 PM
Published 15/07/2025
Share
2 Min Read
SHARE

LUCKNOW| 15TH JULY 2025 – A court in Uttar Pradesh’s Lucknow has granted bail to Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi in a defamation case filed over his remarks about the Indian Army during the 2022 Bharat Jodo Yatra.

Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Alok Verma granted Gandhi bail on the condition that he furnishes a personal bond of ₹20,000 along with two sureties of the same amount. The matter has been listed for the next hearing on August 13.

BACKGROUND OF THE CASE

Rahul Gandhi appeared before the trial court after the Allahabad High Court rejected his plea against a summoning order.

-Story After Advertisement -

The defamation complaint was filed by lawyer Vivek Tiwari on behalf of Uday Shankar Srivastava, a former director of the Border Roads Organisation with a rank equivalent to an Army Colonel.

Tiwari alleged that Gandhi’s remarks on December 16, 2022, regarding clashes between Indian and Chinese troops were “derogatory and defamatory” toward the Indian Army.

Gandhi had said, “Chinese soldiers are beating up Indian Army personnel in Arunachal Pradesh,” criticizing the government over Chinese actions at the Line of Actual Control (LAC).

-Story After Advertisement -

MULTIPLE LEGAL CHALLENGES

Rahul Gandhi has faced several petitions and defamation cases filed by political rivals and individuals across the country.

In January 2024, the Supreme Court stayed criminal defamation proceedings against Gandhi for allegedly calling Union Home Minister and former BJP President Amit Shah a “murder accused.” The case was based on a complaint by BJP leader Navin Jha, who alleged that Gandhi made the statement during a speech on March 18, 2018, criticizing the BJP and Shah.

Additionally, the Supreme Court recently pulled up Gandhi for his remarks about Hindutva ideologue Vinayak Damodar Savarkar. Gandhi had stated that Savarkar was a “collaborator with the British who received pension from the British,” which stirred fresh controversy.

-Story After Advertisement -

LEGAL REPRESENTATION

Advocates Pranshu Agrawal, Mohd Yasir Abbasi, and Mohammed Samar Ansari appeared for Rahul Gandhi in the Lucknow court.


Related

You Might Also Like

SUPREME COURT STRESSES NEED FOR BALANCED GUIDELINES ON ONLINE SPEECH: “MANY FREE ADVISORS IN THE MARKET”

BOMBAY HIGH COURT SEEKS CBFC REPLY ON DELAY IN CERTIFYING FILM ON YOGI ADITYANATH: ‘AJEY: THE UNTOLD STORY OF A YOGI’

“INFLAMMATORY”: SUPREME COURT SLAMS CARTOONIST HEMANT MALVIYA’S CARICATURE ABOUT PM MODI, RSS

GUJARAT HIGH COURT FINES MAN ₹1 LAKH FOR ATTENDING VIRTUAL HEARING FROM TOILET; CONSIDERS JAIL

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT: SENDING FOUL TEXT MESSAGES DOES NOT AMOUNT TO STALKING UNDER IPC

Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Share

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
YoutubeSubscribe
TelegramFollow

Join Telegram Channel

Join Whatsapp Channel

- Advertisement -
Lawyer's Arc Logo

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
[mc4wp_form]
Popular News
LAW OF TORT

False Imprisonment and Malicious Prosecution Under Tort

LA | Admin
LA | Admin
18/03/2024
Internship Opportunity at Lawyer’s Arc
Right to Freedom of Religion (Articles 25-28)
Advocates (Amendment) Bill, 2025 : The Future of Advocacy in India
Download AIBE 19 Result Live : How & Where to Download Result Aibe XIX
- Advertisement -
Submit Post LAwyer's ArcSubmit Post LAwyer's Arc
- Advertisement -
Archives
False Imprisonment and Malicious Prosecution Under Tort
18/03/2024
Lawyer's Arc Internship
Internship Opportunity at Lawyer’s Arc
23/04/2025
Right to Freedom of Religion (Articles 25-28)
18/03/2024
Advocates Amendment Bill
Advocates (Amendment) Bill, 2025 : The Future of Advocacy in India
22/02/2025
AIBE 19 RESULT DOWNLOAD
Download AIBE 19 Result Live : How & Where to Download Result Aibe XIX
23/03/2025

You Might Also Like

KERALA HIGH COURT: LACK OF GOVERNMENT SANCTION NO GROUND TO LET POLICE ESCAPE CUSTODIAL TORTURE CHARGES

10/07/2025

SOUTH KOLKATA LAW COLLEGE RAPE VICTIM TELLS CALCUTTA HIGH COURT SHE IS SATISFIED WITH POLICE PROBE

10/07/2025

SUPREME COURT URGES ECI TO CONSIDER AADHAAR, RATION CARD, EPIC AS VALID VOTER ID DOCUMENTS IN BIHAR SIR 1

10/07/2025

DELHI HIGH COURT RULES BOTH PERU AND CHILE HAVE RIGHTS OVER PISCO, REQUIRES GEOGRAPHIC PREFIX TO AVOID CONFUSION

08/07/2025
Lawyer's ArcLawyer's Arc
© Lawyer's Arc 2020-2025. All Rights Reserved.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?