By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Lawyer's ArcLawyer's ArcLawyer's Arc
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Opportunity
    • Paid Law Internships
    • Internships
    • Jobs
    • Events & Workshops
    • Moot Court
    • Call For Papers
  • Editorials
  • Case Analysis
  • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Disclaimer
    • Privacy Policy
    • Refund and Cancellation Policy
    • Terms of Service
  • Submit Blog
Reading: SUPREME COURT ALLOWS LALIT MODI TO APPROACH CIVIL COURT IN PLEA AGAINST BCCI OVER ED PENALTY
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Font ResizerAa
Lawyer's ArcLawyer's Arc
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Case Analysis
  • Subject Notes
  • Jobs
  • Opportunity
  • Editorials
  • About Us
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Case Analysis
  • Subject Notes
    • LAW OF TORT
    • Constitution Law
    • CRIMINAL LAW
    • Family law
    • Contract Law
    • IPR
    • international law
    • Banking law
    • COMPANY LAW
    • CYBER LAW
    • Environmental law
  • Jobs
  • Opportunity
    • Internships
    • Paid Law Internships
    • Events & Workshops
  • Editorials
  • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Disclaimer
    • Privacy Policy
    • Refund and Cancellation Policy
    • Terms of Service
    • Submit Blog Post
Follow US
© Lawyer's Arc 2020-2025. All Rights Reserved.
Lawyer's Arc > SUPREME COURT ALLOWS LALIT MODI TO APPROACH CIVIL COURT IN PLEA AGAINST BCCI OVER ED PENALTY

SUPREME COURT ALLOWS LALIT MODI TO APPROACH CIVIL COURT IN PLEA AGAINST BCCI OVER ED PENALTY

Aaryansh Agrawal
Last updated: 30/06/2025 3:46 PM
Published 30/06/2025
Share
4 Min Read
From Google Supreme Court
SHARE

NEW DELHI, | JUNE 30, 2025 — The Supreme Court on Monday allowed former Indian Premier League (IPL) chief Lalit Modi to approach a civil court with his plea seeking directions to the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) to pay a penalty of ₹10.65 crore imposed on him by the Enforcement Directorate (ED).

A Bench comprising Justices PS Narasimha and R Mahadevan was hearing Modi’s appeal challenging the Bombay High Court’s dismissal of his plea.

BACKGROUND OF THE CASE

The Bombay High Court had earlier dismissed Modi’s writ petition as “misconceived” and imposed costs of ₹1 lakh on him. The plea had sought directions to the BCCI to pay the ₹10.65 crore penalty imposed by the ED for alleged violations of the Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA) during the 2009 IPL season held in South Africa.

-Story After Advertisement -

ARGUMENTS BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT

Before the Supreme Court, Modi’s counsel argued that the matter fell within the scope of writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. He submitted that similar interim relief had been granted to other officials, including former BCCI chief N Srinivasan.

“In appellate proceedings under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA), others who were slapped with similar penalties by the ED — including former BCCI chief N Srinivasan and other officials — have got interim relief,” Modi’s counsel said.

The Bench questioned,

-Story After Advertisement -

“Why have they not given it (interim relief) to you?”

To which Modi’s counsel responded,

“It is personal…But in all fairness, when I filed it before an appellate authority of PMLA — not only was I a party but Mr. N Srinivasan and other officers were also parties. The interim order protects these people on the same footing, saying that BCCI should deposit ₹10 crore. That order is also placed on record.”

-Story After Advertisement -

He further added,

“All I am saying is that, today, in case that appeal is not held in my favour — ultimately it is an interim order — I may at least be relegated to a civil suit.”

SUPREME COURT’S DECISION

The Supreme Court allowed Modi to withdraw his plea and granted him liberty to approach a civil court.

-Story After Advertisement -

“Then we will say that…You withdraw this, your rights are kept intact to approach the court by filing civil suit,” the Court stated.

Accordingly, the plea was disposed of.

“(Counsel for Lalit Modi) very fairly stated that even if the petition under Article 226 is not maintainable, the appellant should be entitled to avail civil remedies…Recording this statement, the Special Leave Petition is disposed of,” the order read.

-Story After Advertisement -

CONTEXT OF ED PENALTY

The ₹10.65 crore penalty on Modi was part of a broader investigation by the ED into the 2009 IPL season, during which over ₹243 crore was allegedly transferred outside India in violation of FEMA rules.

In 2018, the ED imposed total penalties amounting to ₹121.56 crore on multiple parties, including the BCCI, its then-chairman N Srinivasan, and other officials.


Related

You Might Also Like

KERALA HIGH COURT SLAMS CBFC FOR OBJECTING TO MOVIE TITLE “JANAKI V STATE OF KERALA”

BCI CONSIDERING ACTION AGAINST SILF FOR “MISLEADING” COMMENTS ON ENTRY OF FOREIGN LAW FIRMS

BOMBAY HIGH COURT: ARRESTED PERSON MUST BE PRODUCED BEFORE MAGISTRATE WITHIN 24 HOURS, PRE-ARREST MEDICAL EXAMINATION CANNOT JUSTIFY DELAY

GUJARAT HIGH COURT UPHOLDS RS 6.25 LAKH COMPENSATION TO PARENTS OF YOUTH ELECTROCUTED DUE TO HANGING ELECTRIC WIRES

POONCH COURT ORDERS FIR AGAINST ZEE NEWS AND NEWS18 INDIA FOR DEFAMATORY COVERAGE OF TEACHER DURING OPERATION SINDOOR

Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Share

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
YoutubeSubscribe
TelegramFollow

Join Telegram Channel

Join Whatsapp Channel

- Advertisement -
Lawyer's Arc Logo

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
[mc4wp_form]
Popular News
LAW OF TORT

False Imprisonment and Malicious Prosecution Under Tort

LA | Admin
LA | Admin
18/03/2024
Internship Opportunity at Lawyer’s Arc
Right to Freedom of Religion (Articles 25-28)
Advocates (Amendment) Bill, 2025 : The Future of Advocacy in India
Download AIBE 19 Result Live : How & Where to Download Result Aibe XIX
- Advertisement -
Submit Post LAwyer's ArcSubmit Post LAwyer's Arc
- Advertisement -
Archives
False Imprisonment and Malicious Prosecution Under Tort
18/03/2024
Lawyer's Arc Internship
Internship Opportunity at Lawyer’s Arc
23/04/2025
Right to Freedom of Religion (Articles 25-28)
18/03/2024
Advocates Amendment Bill
Advocates (Amendment) Bill, 2025 : The Future of Advocacy in India
22/02/2025
AIBE 19 RESULT DOWNLOAD
Download AIBE 19 Result Live : How & Where to Download Result Aibe XIX
23/03/2025

You Might Also Like

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT: STATE OFFICIALS TAKE “PRIDE” IN FLOUTING JUDICIAL ORDERS, SAYS JUSTICE JJ MUNIR

27/06/2025

MADRAS HIGH COURT: CHARITABLE INSTITUTIONS SHOULD NOT BE VIEWED WITH SUSPICION FOR RECEIVING FOREIGN CONTRIBUTIONS

27/06/2025

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT: LIVE-IN RELATIONSHIPS OFTEN END IN LEGAL BATTLES, GO AGAINST INDIAN MIDDLE-CLASS VALUES

27/06/2025

MADRAS HIGH COURT UPHOLDS ₹1 LAKH COMPENSATION FOR MAN SUBJECTED TO INHUMAN TREATMENT IN POLICE CUSTODY

26/06/2025
Lawyer's ArcLawyer's Arc
© Lawyer's Arc 2020-2025. All Rights Reserved.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?