By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Lawyer's ArcLawyer's ArcLawyer's Arc
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Opportunity
    • Paid Law Internships
    • Internships
    • Jobs
    • Events & Workshops
    • Moot Court
    • Call For Papers
  • Editorials
  • Case Analysis
  • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Disclaimer
    • Privacy Policy
    • Refund and Cancellation Policy
    • Terms of Service
  • Submit Blog
Reading: SC JUDGES’ ASSET DECLARATIONS TO GO PUBLIC AMID ALLEGATIONS AGAINST JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMA
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Font ResizerAa
Lawyer's ArcLawyer's Arc
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Case Analysis
  • Subject Notes
  • Jobs
  • Opportunity
  • Editorials
  • About Us
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Case Analysis
  • Subject Notes
    • LAW OF TORT
    • Constitution Law
    • CRIMINAL LAW
    • Family law
    • Contract Law
    • IPR
    • international law
    • Banking law
    • COMPANY LAW
    • CYBER LAW
    • Environmental law
  • Jobs
  • Opportunity
    • Internships
    • Paid Law Internships
    • Events & Workshops
  • Editorials
  • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Disclaimer
    • Privacy Policy
    • Refund and Cancellation Policy
    • Terms of Service
    • Submit Blog Post
Follow US
© Lawyer's Arc 2020-2025. All Rights Reserved.
Lawyer's Arc > Editorials > SC JUDGES’ ASSET DECLARATIONS TO GO PUBLIC AMID ALLEGATIONS AGAINST JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMA
EditorialsNews

SC JUDGES’ ASSET DECLARATIONS TO GO PUBLIC AMID ALLEGATIONS AGAINST JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMA

Image Source- The Hindu - https___thi.thgim_.com_public_incoming_xk95m_article69408033.ece_alternates_LANDSCAPE_1200_20250317228L.jpg.png
Pankaj Pandey
Last updated: 12/04/2025 1:21 AM
Pankaj Pandey
Published 11/04/2025
Share
6 Min Read
SHARE

NEW DELHI, APRIL 11 2025 — In a landmark move to restore public trust and enhance transparency, the Supreme Court of India has announced that all serving judges, and those appointed in the future, will publicly disclose their assets and liabilities on the official Supreme Court website.

Contents
HISTORY OF VOLUNTARY DECLARATIONSHOW MANY JUDGES DISCLOSE THEIR ASSETS TODAY?HIGH COURTS WITH AND WITHOUT ASSET DISCLOSURESCourts with No Asset Information:Courts Leading in Transparency:WHAT THE LAW SAYS ABOUT JUDICIAL ASSET DISCLOSURESTHE UNFINISHED LEGISLATIVE ATTEMPT: THE 2010 BILLPARLIAMENTARY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR MANDATORY DISCLOSURESGOVERNMENT AND SC’S RESPONSE TO THE COMMITTEECONCLUSION

This decision follows allegations involving Justice Yashwant Varma, after a fire at his Delhi residence allegedly revealed a large stash of unaccounted cash, igniting public outrage and prompting the apex court to act.

HISTORY OF VOLUNTARY DECLARATIONS

Judicial asset disclosure is not a new conversation. In 1997, the Supreme Court adopted a resolution titled “Restatement of Values of Judicial Life”, requiring apex court judges to declare their assets to the Chief Justice of India (CJI), and High Court judges to their respective Chief Justices. However, these disclosures were not made public and required annual updates.

-Story After Advertisement -

In 2009, the Court, under public pressure, allowed judges to voluntarily disclose their assets to the public. Yet, compliance remained low.

HOW MANY JUDGES DISCLOSE THEIR ASSETS TODAY?

An independent review as of April 11, 2025, paints a concerning picture:

  • Only 11.94% of all sitting judges in India have made their asset declarations public.
  • While 30 out of 33 Supreme Court judges have submitted their disclosures to the CJI, the details are not yet visible on the Court’s website, reportedly due to technical issues.
  • Among the 762 High Court judges, just 95 (12.46%) have disclosed their assets publicly.

HIGH COURTS WITH AND WITHOUT ASSET DISCLOSURES

Courts with No Asset Information:

Eighteen High Courts, including:

-Story After Advertisement -
  • Allahabad High Court (81 judges)
  • Bombay High Court
  • Calcutta High Court
  • Gujarat High Court
  • Patna High Court

…have no asset data published on their official websites.

Courts Leading in Transparency:

  • Kerala High Court: 41 out of 44 judges (93%)
  • Himachal Pradesh High Court: 11 out of 12 judges
  • Punjab & Haryana High Court: 30 out of 53 judges
  • Delhi High Court: 7 out of 36 judges
  • Madras High Court: 5 judges
  • Chhattisgarh High Court: 1 judge

WHAT THE LAW SAYS ABOUT JUDICIAL ASSET DISCLOSURES

Currently, there is no legal mandate requiring judges to publicly disclose their assets. The Supreme Court Judges (Salaries and Conditions of Service) Act, 1958 and High Court Judges (Salaries and Conditions of Service) Act, 1954 do not contain any such provision.

All current declarations are made voluntarily based on internal resolutions of the judiciary.

-Story After Advertisement -

THE UNFINISHED LEGISLATIVE ATTEMPT: THE 2010 BILL

The Judicial Standards and Accountability Bill introduced by the UPA government in 2010 sought to mandate judges to disclose the assets of themselves, their spouses, and children.

The Bill was intended to replace the Judges Inquiry Act, 1968 but lapsed with the dissolution of the 15th Lok Sabha and has not been reintroduced since.

PARLIAMENTARY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR MANDATORY DISCLOSURES

A parliamentary standing committee on personnel, public grievances and law and justice, in August 2023, emphasized the need for legislation:

-Story After Advertisement -

“Anybody holding public office and drawing a salary from the exchequer should mandatorily furnish annual returns of their property.”

It questioned why judges should be exempt, especially when the Supreme Court had previously upheld the public’s right to know about the assets of MPs and MLAs.

“As the last resolution of the Supreme Court on the declaration of assets by Judges on a voluntary basis is not complied with, the Committee recommends the Government to bring about appropriate legislation to make it mandatory for Judges of the higher judiciary (Supreme Court and High Courts) to furnish their property returns on an annual basis to the appropriate authority.”

-Story After Advertisement -

GOVERNMENT AND SC’S RESPONSE TO THE COMMITTEE

On March 27, 2025, in response to a question by RJD MP Manoj Kumar Jha, the Union Law Minister Arjun Ram Meghwal informed the Rajya Sabha that the government had raised the issue with the Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court formed a judicial committee to review the matter and reported that the issue had already been addressed in a 2020 Constitution Bench ruling, stating that the procedure followed was in conformity with judicial precedent.

The committee proposed that:

“The official website of the Supreme Court should display the name of the judges, who have made declaration of assets to the Chief Justice.”

The Chief Justice of India approved this proposal and the names of judges who have complied are now publicly listed on the apex court’s website.

CONCLUSION

The Supreme Court’s decision marks a crucial step toward institutional transparency and restoring public faith in the judiciary. However, with only a fraction of judges disclosing their assets, especially in High Courts, the move must be backed by legislative reforms to ensure uniform, mandatory compliance across the country.


Related

You Might Also Like

SUPREME COURT STRUGGLES WITH JUSTICE SURESHWAR THAKUR’S JUDGMENT, STAYS HIGH COURT ORDER ON NATIONAL HIGHWAYS ACT

PATENT LAW: DR. REDDY’S UNDERTAKES NOT TO SELL OZEMPIC-LIKE DRUG IN INDIA AMID PATENT SUIT BY NOVO NORDISK (1ST JUNE)

India-Pakistan Tensions: Pakistan Breaches Ceasefire Again Despite Recent Agreement with India

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ORDERS PRESERVATION OF BYJU’S CIRP EMAIL RECORDS AMID CRIMINAL PROBE

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT ORDERS DEPLOYMENT OF CENTRAL ARMED FORCES IN MURSHIDABAD AFTER WAQF ACT PROTEST TURNS VIOLENT

TAGGED:Supreme Court of India
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Share
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
YoutubeSubscribe
TelegramFollow

Join Telegram Channel

Join Whatsapp Channel

- Advertisement -
Lawyer's Arc Logo

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
[mc4wp_form]
Popular News
LAW OF TORT

False Imprisonment and Malicious Prosecution Under Tort

LA | Admin
LA | Admin
18/03/2024
Internship Opportunity at Lawyer’s Arc
Right to Freedom of Religion (Articles 25-28)
Advocates (Amendment) Bill, 2025 : The Future of Advocacy in India
Download AIBE 19 Result Live : How & Where to Download Result Aibe XIX
- Advertisement -
Submit Post LAwyer's ArcSubmit Post LAwyer's Arc
- Advertisement -
Archives
False Imprisonment and Malicious Prosecution Under Tort
18/03/2024
Lawyer's Arc Internship
Internship Opportunity at Lawyer’s Arc
23/04/2025
Right to Freedom of Religion (Articles 25-28)
18/03/2024
Advocates Amendment Bill
Advocates (Amendment) Bill, 2025 : The Future of Advocacy in India
22/02/2025
AIBE 19 RESULT DOWNLOAD
Download AIBE 19 Result Live : How & Where to Download Result Aibe XIX
23/03/2025

You Might Also Like

EditorialsNews

UP COP NAMES JUDGE AS ACCUSED IN THEFT CASE PROCLAMATION, COURT ORDERS PROBE

13/04/2025
EditorialsNews

SUPREME COURT DIRECTS FSSAI TO SUBMIT REPORT ON FRONT-OF-PACKAGE WARNING LABELS WITHIN THREE MONTHS

13/04/2025
EditorialsNews

MADRAS HIGH COURT SLAMS DELAY IN COMPASSIONATE APPOINTMENT, ORDERS JOB FOR DECEASED GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEE’S WIDOW

13/04/2025
EditorialsNews

SUPREME COURT CLARIFIES PRESIDENT AND GOVERNOR’S POWERS OVER STATE BILLS IN LANDMARK VERDICT

12/04/2025
Lawyer's ArcLawyer's Arc
© Lawyer's Arc 2020-2025. All Rights Reserved.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?