By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Lawyer's ArcLawyer's ArcLawyer's Arc
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Opportunity
    • Paid Law Internships
    • Internships
    • Jobs
    • Events & Workshops
    • Moot Court
    • Call For Papers
  • Editorials
  • Case Analysis
  • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Disclaimer
    • Privacy Policy
    • Refund and Cancellation Policy
    • Terms of Service
  • Submit Blog
Reading: SUPREME COURT CENSURES CONVICT FOR REPEATED PLEA TO DELAY SURRENDER IN MURDER CASE [VINOD @ GANJA VS STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI)] (3RD JUNE)
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Font ResizerAa
Lawyer's ArcLawyer's Arc
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Case Analysis
  • Subject Notes
  • Jobs
  • Opportunity
  • Editorials
  • About Us
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Case Analysis
  • Subject Notes
    • LAW OF TORT
    • Constitution Law
    • CRIMINAL LAW
    • Family law
    • Contract Law
    • IPR
    • international law
    • Banking law
    • COMPANY LAW
    • CYBER LAW
    • Environmental law
  • Jobs
  • Opportunity
    • Internships
    • Paid Law Internships
    • Events & Workshops
  • Editorials
  • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Disclaimer
    • Privacy Policy
    • Refund and Cancellation Policy
    • Terms of Service
    • Submit Blog Post
Follow US
© Lawyer's Arc 2020-2025. All Rights Reserved.
Lawyer's Arc > CRIMINAL LAW > SUPREME COURT CENSURES CONVICT FOR REPEATED PLEA TO DELAY SURRENDER IN MURDER CASE [VINOD @ GANJA VS STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI)] (3RD JUNE)
CRIMINAL LAW

SUPREME COURT CENSURES CONVICT FOR REPEATED PLEA TO DELAY SURRENDER IN MURDER CASE [VINOD @ GANJA VS STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI)] (3RD JUNE)

Supreme Court
Aaryansh Agrawal
Last updated: 04/06/2025 5:37 PM
Aaryansh Agrawal
Published 04/06/2025
Share
3 Min Read
SHARE

NEW DELHI | 3RD JUNE 2025

Contents
BACKGROUNDPETITIONER’S ARGUMENTCOURT’S DIRECTIONWITHDRAWAL ATTEMPT REJECTEDCASE HISTORY

BACKGROUND

In a significant development, the Supreme Court on Wednesday censured a murder convict, Vinod @ Ganja, for repeatedly approaching the apex court to seek further delay in surrendering before the jail authorities.

The Bench of Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah and Justice SVN Bhatti expressed serious disapproval after noting that a coordinate bench headed by Justice Abhay S. Oka had already rejected a similar plea on May 14.

-Story After Advertisement -

“How dare you file this… coordinate bench headed by Justice [Abhay] Oka (rejected it) and you have guts to file it during vacation,” the Court remarked sharply.

PETITIONER’S ARGUMENT

Senior Advocate Rishi Malhotra, appearing for the convict, submitted that the petitioner was only seeking an additional three weeks to surrender, given that his premature release plea is pending before the Delhi High Court and is scheduled for hearing on July 10, 2025.

Malhotra emphasized that the earlier bench had granted three weeks’ time to surrender, and the new application merely sought an extension of that period.

-Story After Advertisement -

However, the Court remained unconvinced with this justification.

“Filing of present case is absolutely uncalled for, unwarranted and needs to be dealt with strictly,” the Court stated.

COURT’S DIRECTION

The Bench ordered immediate surrender and warned of serious consequences for the misuse of judicial process.

-Story After Advertisement -

“Accordingly, it is directed petitioner should surrender today itself and the Court will consider what other order needs to be passed in facts and circumstances of the case,” the Court ordered.

WITHDRAWAL ATTEMPT REJECTED

At this stage, Advocate-on-Record (AOR) Sweta Rani attempted to withdraw the plea:

“Lordship, I am AOR in the matter, I am extremely sorry. I may be allowed to withdraw this petition. My humble request.”

-Story After Advertisement -

However, the Court refused to allow withdrawal:

“Not permitted. Rejected.”

CASE HISTORY

The petitioner is a convict in a 1992 FIR (No. 40/1992) registered at Police Station Mukherjee Nagar, Delhi under Sections 302/307/34 IPC and Sections 27/30/54 of the Arms Act.

-Story After Advertisement -

He has undergone more than 14 years of actual imprisonment, and 16 years including remission.

On April 28, 2025, he was granted furlough.

The Delhi High Court, while issuing notice on his premature release plea on May 5, 2025, declined to stay his surrender date of May 20.

“Since the main petition is coming up for hearing on 10.07.2025, this Court, at this stage, does not find it appropriate to pass any order or to direct the petitioner to not surrender on 20.05.2025,” the High Court had ruled.

The Supreme Court had earlier agreed with the High Court’s stance but granted three weeks to surrender, which the petitioner again sought to extend on May 27, 2025—prompting today’s censure and refusal.

READ MORE: https://www.lawyersarc.com/news/supreme-court-pulls-up-murder-convict-for-second-plea-seeking-time-to-surrender

Related

You Might Also Like

KERALA HIGH COURT: MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE CAUSING DEATH NOT ALWAYS CULPABLE HOMICIDE UNDER IPC SECTION 304

SUPREME COURT SLAMS KERALA FOR MISUSE OF PREVENTIVE DETENTION AFTER BAIL GRANT (5th JUNE)

BNSS: BOMBAY HIGH COURT DECLARES ARREST BY IMMIGRATION AUTHORITIES ILLEGAL FOR BREACH OF ARTICLE 22(2) AND BNSS NORMS

CHENNAI SESSIONS COURT SENTENCES GNANASEKARAN TO LIFE IMPRISONMENT IN ANNA UNIVERSITY SEXUAL ASSAULT CASE (2nd JUNE)

IS THE DEATH PENALTY A VIOLATION OF HUMAN DIGNITY?

Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Share
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
YoutubeSubscribe
TelegramFollow

Join Telegram Channel

Join Whatsapp Channel

- Advertisement -
Lawyer's Arc Logo

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
[mc4wp_form]
Popular News
LAW OF TORT

False Imprisonment and Malicious Prosecution Under Tort

LA | Admin
LA | Admin
18/03/2024
Internship Opportunity at Lawyer’s Arc
Right to Freedom of Religion (Articles 25-28)
Advocates (Amendment) Bill, 2025 : The Future of Advocacy in India
Download AIBE 19 Result Live : How & Where to Download Result Aibe XIX
- Advertisement -
Submit Post LAwyer's ArcSubmit Post LAwyer's Arc
- Advertisement -
Archives
False Imprisonment and Malicious Prosecution Under Tort
18/03/2024
Lawyer's Arc Internship
Internship Opportunity at Lawyer’s Arc
23/04/2025
Right to Freedom of Religion (Articles 25-28)
18/03/2024
Advocates Amendment Bill
Advocates (Amendment) Bill, 2025 : The Future of Advocacy in India
22/02/2025
AIBE 19 RESULT DOWNLOAD
Download AIBE 19 Result Live : How & Where to Download Result Aibe XIX
23/03/2025

You Might Also Like

CRIMINAL LAW

Law, Society, and Protection: A Comprehensive Analysis of Offences Against Women and Children in India

14/05/2025
CRIMINAL LAWCRPC

Bail, Anticipatory bail and Default Bail : Analysis 

03/05/2025
CRIMINAL LAW

Juvenile Justice Act : Balancing Reform and Punishment

03/05/2025
CRIMINAL LAW

Offences Against Human Body: A Legal Analysis

01/05/2025
Lawyer's ArcLawyer's Arc
© Lawyer's Arc 2020-2025. All Rights Reserved.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?