By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Disclaimer.
Accept
Lawyer's ArcLawyer's ArcLawyer's Arc
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Opportunity
    • Paid Law Internships
    • Internships
    • Jobs
    • Events & Workshops
    • Moot Court
    • Call For Papers
  • Editorials
  • Case Analysis
  • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Disclaimer
    • Privacy Policy
    • Refund and Cancellation Policy
    • Terms of Service
  • Submit Blog
  • My Interests
Reading: GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI vs OFFICE OF LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR OF DELHI, 2024
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Font ResizerAa
Lawyer's ArcLawyer's Arc
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Case Analysis
  • Subject Notes
    • LAW OF TORT
    • Constitution Law
    • CRIMINAL LAW
    • Family law
    • Contract Law
    • IPR
    • international law
    • Banking law
    • COMPANY LAW
    • CYBER LAW
    • Environmental law
  • Jobs
  • Opportunity
    • Internships
    • Paid Law Internships
    • Events & Workshops
  • Editorials
  • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Disclaimer
    • Privacy Policy
    • Refund and Cancellation Policy
    • Terms of Service
    • Submit Blog Post
  • Customize Interests
Follow US
© Lawyer's Arc 2020-2025. All Rights Reserved.
Lawyer's Arc > Landmark Judgements > GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI vs OFFICE OF LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR OF DELHI, 2024
Landmark Judgements

GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI vs OFFICE OF LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR OF DELHI, 2024

Whether the Lieutenant Governor of Delhi is bound by the aid and advice of the elected Delhi Government when nominating members of the Municipal Corporation of Delhi

Last updated: 04/10/2025 7:06 PM
Pankaj Pandey
Published 04/10/2025
Share
5 Min Read
SHARE
Contents
GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI vs OFFICE OF LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR OF DELHI, 2024Factual BackgroundIssue(s)Decision of the Supreme CourtReason for the decisionConclusion

GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI vs OFFICE OF LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR OF DELHI, 2024

Case Title and Citation: GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI V. OFFICE OF LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR OF DELHI 2024 INSC 578 (5 August 2024)

Factual Background

The Delhi Municipal Corporation (DMC) is constituted by 250 directly elected councillors. Section 3(3)(b)(i) of the Delhi Municipal Corporation (DMC) Act, 1957, allows the Lieutenant Governor (LG) of Delhi to nominate ten individuals with specialised knowledge in municipal administration to the Corporation. Following the DMC elections held on December 4, 2022, the Aam Aadmi Party secured a majority by winning 134 out of 250 wards. On January 3, 2023, the LG proceeded to nominate ten members to the Corporation. The Government of NCT of Delhi (GNCTD) subsequently filed a Writ Petition with the Supreme Court, challenging the legality of these nominations. The GNCTD sought a ruling that the LG was required to make nominations only according to the advice of the elected Council of Ministers.

Issue(s)

The central question before the Supreme Court was whether the Lieutenant Governor (LG) is required to exercise the power of nomination under Section 3(3)(b)(i) of the DMC Act based on the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers of the NCTD, as mandated by Article 239AA(4) of the Constitution. Alternatively, the issue was whether the LG exercises this specific power as an independent statutory duty.

-Story After Advertisement -

Decision of the Supreme Court

The Supreme Court dismissed the Writ Petition. The Court definitively held that the Lieutenant Governor is not bound by the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers of the Delhi Government when exercising the power to nominate members to the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) under Section 3(3)(b)(i) of the DMC Act. Consequently, the notifications issued by the LG on January 3, 2023, and January 4, 2023, were upheld as not being in violation of Article 239AA.

Reason for the decision

The Court’s decision rested on the unique constitutional status of the NCTD and the character of the DMC Act as a Parliamentary enactment.

  1. Nature of the DMC Act: The DMC Act is a law enacted by Parliament concerning local government, which falls under Entry 5 of the State List. When Parliament legislates on a subject matter contained in List II (State List) or List III (Concurrent List), the executive power of the GNCTD regarding that subject is limited by the law enacted by Parliament.
  2. LG’s Discretion under Article 239AA(4): Article 239AA(4) dictates that the LG acts on the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers, but it provides a specific exception where the LG is “by or under any law, required to act in his discretion”. This contrasts with the position of a State Governor, whose discretion is limited only to instances specified “by or under this Constitution”.
  3. Statutory Duty: The Court found that the DMC Act satisfies the “by or under any law” exception, as it is a Parliamentary law that requires the LG to exercise the power of nomination. This power is exercised as a statutory duty of the LG, distinct from the executive power of the GNCTD.
  4. Intent of Parliament: The power to nominate experts was introduced in Section 3(3)(b)(i) by the 1993 Amendment to the DMC Act, which was subsequent to the establishment of the Legislative Assembly and Article 239AA. This demonstrated that the vesting of power in the LG was deliberate, not merely a continuance of previous legislation.
  5. Distribution of Authority: The DMC Act systematically distributes distinct powers among various authorities. The LG is entrusted with powers related to the nomination of experts, appointment of the Election Commissioner, and constitution of the Finance Commission, suggesting an independent role. Meanwhile, the GNCTD is assigned powers related to making bye-laws, recruitment, and appointing taxation tribunals. This statutory scheme confirms that the LG is intended to act independently when performing the specific duty of nomination.

Conclusion

The Supreme Court concluded that since the DMC Act is a law made by Parliament specifically vesting the nomination power in the LG, the LG exercises this function as a mandatory statutory duty. Therefore, this power falls under the exception provided in Article 239AA(4), allowing the LG to act in discretion without requiring the aid and advice of the GNCTD Council of Ministers for the nomination of the ten members.

-Story After Advertisement -

Related

You Might Also Like

ALL INDIA JUDGES ASSOCIATION vs UNION OF INDIA, 2025

GAYATRI BALASAMY vs M/S ISG NOVASOFT TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED, 2025

VARSHATAI vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, 2025

IMRAN PRATAPGADHI vs STATE OF GUJARAT 2025

SUNIL KUMAR SINGH vs BIHAR LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL, 2025

TAGGED:GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI vs OFFICE OF LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR OF DELHI 2024

Sign Up For Daily Newsletter

Be keep up! Get the latest breaking news delivered straight to your inbox.
[mc4wp_form]
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Use and acknowledge the data practices in our Privacy Policy. You may unsubscribe at any time.
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Share
What do you think?
Love0
Surprise0
Sad0
Happy0
Angry0
Dead0
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Updates Just a Click Away ! Follow Us

InstagramFollow
TelegramFollow
1.2kFollow
1.6kFollow

Join Telegram Channel

Join Whatsapp Channel

Lawyer's Arc Logo

Hey! Lawyer's Archian

One click. One opportunity closer to your legal hustle.
[mc4wp_form]
In Trend
LAW OF TORT

False Imprisonment and Malicious Prosecution Under Tort

LA | Admin
LA | Admin
18/03/2024
Internship Opportunity at Lawyer’s Arc
Right to Freedom of Religion (Articles 25-28)
Advocates (Amendment) Bill, 2025 : The Future of Advocacy in India
Download AIBE 19 Result Live : How & Where to Download Result Aibe XIX
- Advertisement -
Submit Post LAwyer's ArcSubmit Post LAwyer's Arc
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Archives
False Imprisonment and Malicious Prosecution Under Tort
18/03/2024
Lawyer's Arc Internship
Internship Opportunity at Lawyer’s Arc
23/04/2025
Right to Freedom of Religion (Articles 25-28)
18/03/2024
Advocates Amendment Bill
Advocates (Amendment) Bill, 2025 : The Future of Advocacy in India
22/02/2025
AIBE 19 RESULT DOWNLOAD
Download AIBE 19 Result Live : How & Where to Download Result Aibe XIX
23/03/2025

You Might Also Like

VIHAAN KUMAR vs THE STATE OF HARYANA 2025

Pankaj Pandey
Pankaj Pandey
05/10/2025

INDEPENDENT SUGAR CORPORATION LIMITED vs GIRISH SRIRAM JUNEJA, 2025

Pankaj Pandey
Pankaj Pandey
05/10/2025

JYOSTNAMAYEE MISHRA vs THE STATE OF ODISHA 2025

Pankaj Pandey
Pankaj Pandey
05/10/2025

URMILA DIXIT vs SUNIL SHARAN DIXIT, 2025

Pankaj Pandey
Pankaj Pandey
05/10/2025
Previous Next
Lawyer's ArcLawyer's Arc
© Lawyer's Arc 2020-2025. All Rights Reserved.
Hey Lawyer's Archian !
One click. One opportunity closer to your legal hustle.
[mc4wp_form]
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?