By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Disclaimer.
Accept
Lawyer's ArcLawyer's ArcLawyer's Arc
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Opportunity
    • Paid Law Internships
    • Internships
    • Jobs
    • Events & Workshops
    • Moot Court
    • Call For Papers
  • Editorials
  • Case Analysis
  • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Disclaimer
    • Privacy Policy
    • Refund and Cancellation Policy
    • Terms of Service
  • Submit Blog
  • My Interests
Reading: IN RE: ALLEGED RAPE AND MURDER INCIDENT OF A TRAINEE DOCTOR IN R.G. KAR MEDICAL COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL, KOLKATA,, AND RELATED ISSUES vs 2024
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Font ResizerAa
Lawyer's ArcLawyer's Arc
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Case Analysis
  • Subject Notes
    • LAW OF TORT
    • Constitution Law
    • CRIMINAL LAW
    • Family law
    • Contract Law
    • IPR
    • international law
    • Banking law
    • COMPANY LAW
    • CYBER LAW
    • Environmental law
  • Jobs
  • Opportunity
    • Internships
    • Paid Law Internships
    • Events & Workshops
  • Editorials
  • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Disclaimer
    • Privacy Policy
    • Refund and Cancellation Policy
    • Terms of Service
    • Submit Blog Post
  • Customize Interests
Follow US
© Lawyer's Arc 2020-2025. All Rights Reserved.
Lawyer's Arc > Landmark Judgements > IN RE: ALLEGED RAPE AND MURDER INCIDENT OF A TRAINEE DOCTOR IN R.G. KAR MEDICAL COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL, KOLKATA,, AND RELATED ISSUES vs 2024
Landmark Judgements

IN RE: ALLEGED RAPE AND MURDER INCIDENT OF A TRAINEE DOCTOR IN R.G. KAR MEDICAL COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL, KOLKATA,, AND RELATED ISSUES vs 2024

Urgent need to formulate institutional safety measures for medical professionals following the murder and alleged rape of a doctor in Kolkata.

Last updated: 04/10/2025 7:52 PM
Pankaj Pandey
Published 04/10/2025
Share
6 Min Read
SHARE
Contents
IN RE: ALLEGED RAPE AND MURDER INCIDENT OF A TRAINEE DOCTOR IN R.G. KAR MEDICAL COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL, KOLKATA, AND RELATED ISSUES vs 2024Factual BackgroundIssue(s)Decision of the Supreme CourtReason for the decisionConclusion

IN RE: ALLEGED RAPE AND MURDER INCIDENT OF A TRAINEE DOCTOR IN R.G. KAR MEDICAL COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL, KOLKATA, AND RELATED ISSUES vs 2024


Case Title and Citation: IN RE: ALLEGED RAPE AND MURDER INCIDENT OF A TRAINEE DOCTOR IN R.G. KAR MEDICAL COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL, KOLKATA AND RELATED ISSUES vs SMW(Crl) No. 2/2024

Factual Background

The matter was initiated following the alleged rape and murder of a 31-year-old postgraduate doctor on August 9, 2024, inside the seminar room of the RG Kar Medical College Hospital in Kolkata, while she was on a 36-hour duty shift. The incident caused significant national shock due to the brutality of the sexual assault. Initially, the deceased’s parents were informed that the death was a suicide, and the police registered the First Information Report (FIR) for murder only after several hours. Concerns over the handling of the case by the hospital authorities and state police led the Calcutta High Court, on August 13, 2024, to transfer the investigation to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI). Following the incident, widespread protests occurred, and on the night of August 15, 2024, a large mob vandalized the Emergency Ward and other departments of the same hospital. This vandalism prompted the Indian Medical Association to call for a nationwide 24-hour strike by medical personnel, excluding emergency services.

Issue(s)

The core issue addressed by the Supreme Court was whether the current institutional safety and working conditions for doctors and medical professionals in hospitals across the country are adequate, and if the existing systemic lack of protection necessitates the Supreme Court’s intervention through the creation of a national protocol.

-Story After Advertisement -

Decision of the Supreme Court

The Supreme Court set up a nine-member National Task Force (NTF) to formulate a national protocol aimed at ensuring the safety and well-being of doctors and medical professionals nationwide. The Court further mandated the NTF to devise effective recommendations focusing on two primary areas: (I) Preventing violence, including gender-based violence, against medical professionals; and (II) Establishing an enforceable national protocol for dignified and safe working conditions for all medical professionals, including interns, residents, and nurses. The Court also ordered the CBI and the State of West Bengal to submit status reports on the progress of the murder investigation and the vandalism incidents, respectively, by August 22, 2024.

Reason for the decision

The Court’s decision was driven by the recognition of a systemic failure to protect medical professionals and the constitutional obligation to ensure safe working conditions.

  1. Vulnerability to Violence: The Supreme Court noted that medical professionals are frequent targets of various forms of violence, often attributed to distraught patients or relatives. The unrestricted access to every part of healthcare institutions, which operate around the clock, makes these professionals highly susceptible to such attacks. The Court cited specific recent incidents to illustrate this systemic failure.
  2. Lack of Institutional Standards: The Court highlighted critical deficiencies in safety standards, including the absence of adequate resting spaces for medical professionals on night duty, forcing them to rest in public areas or patient rooms. Furthermore, interns and residents are often forced to work demanding 36-hour shifts without basic amenities like sanitation, rest, and nutrition, in the absence of a uniform national protocol.
  3. Gendered Violence: The Court pointed out that women medical professionals face particular risks due to ingrained patriarchal biases, making them more likely to be challenged by patients’ relatives. Additionally, they face sexual violence within the workplace hierarchy from colleagues, seniors, and persons in authority. The lack of institutional safety norms pertaining to violence, including sexual violence, was cited as a serious concern.
  4. Constitutional Imperative: The Court emphasized that preserving safe conditions of work is fundamental to realizing the equality of opportunity for every working professional, particularly as more women enter cutting-edge areas of knowledge. The safety and well-being of health providers are matters of national interest, and the constitutional value of equality demands safe and dignified working conditions.
  5. Inadequacy of Existing Laws: While several States have enacted laws prohibiting violence against medical professionals, these laws only impose enhanced punishment and fail to address the underlying institutional and systemic causes of the problem, thus falling short of effective prevention.

Conclusion

The Supreme Court concluded that the horrific incident and the ensuing nationwide protests underscored a systemic and national failure to ensure the safety and dignity of medical professionals. To address these deep-rooted issues, the Court proactively established a National Task Force, mandated to develop an immediate, enforceable, and comprehensive national protocol to guarantee safe working environments and prevent all forms of violence, including sexual violence, in medical institutions.

-Story After Advertisement -

Related

You Might Also Like

ALL INDIA JUDGES ASSOCIATION vs UNION OF INDIA, 2025

GAYATRI BALASAMY vs M/S ISG NOVASOFT TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED, 2025

VARSHATAI vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, 2025

IMRAN PRATAPGADHI vs STATE OF GUJARAT 2025

SUNIL KUMAR SINGH vs BIHAR LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL, 2025

TAGGED:IN RE: ALLEGED RAPE AND MURDER INCIDENT OF A TRAINEE DOCTOR IN R.G. KAR MEDICAL COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL KOLKATA AND RELATED ISSUES vs 2024

Sign Up For Daily Newsletter

Be keep up! Get the latest breaking news delivered straight to your inbox.
[mc4wp_form]
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Use and acknowledge the data practices in our Privacy Policy. You may unsubscribe at any time.
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Share
What do you think?
Love0
Surprise0
Sad0
Happy0
Angry0
Dead0
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Updates Just a Click Away ! Follow Us

InstagramFollow
TelegramFollow
1.2kFollow
1.6kFollow

Join Telegram Channel

Join Whatsapp Channel

Lawyer's Arc Logo

Hey! Lawyer's Archian

One click. One opportunity closer to your legal hustle.
[mc4wp_form]
In Trend
LAW OF TORT

False Imprisonment and Malicious Prosecution Under Tort

LA | Admin
LA | Admin
18/03/2024
Internship Opportunity at Lawyer’s Arc
Right to Freedom of Religion (Articles 25-28)
Advocates (Amendment) Bill, 2025 : The Future of Advocacy in India
Download AIBE 19 Result Live : How & Where to Download Result Aibe XIX
- Advertisement -
Submit Post LAwyer's ArcSubmit Post LAwyer's Arc
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Archives
False Imprisonment and Malicious Prosecution Under Tort
18/03/2024
Lawyer's Arc Internship
Internship Opportunity at Lawyer’s Arc
23/04/2025
Right to Freedom of Religion (Articles 25-28)
18/03/2024
Advocates Amendment Bill
Advocates (Amendment) Bill, 2025 : The Future of Advocacy in India
22/02/2025
AIBE 19 RESULT DOWNLOAD
Download AIBE 19 Result Live : How & Where to Download Result Aibe XIX
23/03/2025

You Might Also Like

VIHAAN KUMAR vs THE STATE OF HARYANA 2025

Pankaj Pandey
Pankaj Pandey
05/10/2025

INDEPENDENT SUGAR CORPORATION LIMITED vs GIRISH SRIRAM JUNEJA, 2025

Pankaj Pandey
Pankaj Pandey
05/10/2025

JYOSTNAMAYEE MISHRA vs THE STATE OF ODISHA 2025

Pankaj Pandey
Pankaj Pandey
05/10/2025

URMILA DIXIT vs SUNIL SHARAN DIXIT, 2025

Pankaj Pandey
Pankaj Pandey
05/10/2025
Previous Next
Lawyer's ArcLawyer's Arc
© Lawyer's Arc 2020-2025. All Rights Reserved.
Hey Lawyer's Archian !
One click. One opportunity closer to your legal hustle.
[mc4wp_form]
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?