By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Lawyer's ArcLawyer's ArcLawyer's Arc
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Opportunity
    • Paid Law Internships
    • Internships
    • Jobs
    • Events & Workshops
    • Moot Court
    • Call For Papers
  • Editorials
  • Case Analysis
  • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Disclaimer
    • Privacy Policy
    • Refund and Cancellation Policy
    • Terms of Service
  • Submit Blog
Reading: Madhya Pradesh High Court: Male Teachers Can’t Claim Privacy Violation for Sending Photos as Attendance Proof
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Font ResizerAa
Lawyer's ArcLawyer's Arc
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Case Analysis
  • Subject Notes
  • Jobs
  • Opportunity
  • Editorials
  • About Us
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Case Analysis
  • Subject Notes
    • LAW OF TORT
    • Constitution Law
    • CRIMINAL LAW
    • Family law
    • Contract Law
    • IPR
    • international law
    • Banking law
    • COMPANY LAW
    • CYBER LAW
    • Environmental law
  • Jobs
  • Opportunity
    • Internships
    • Paid Law Internships
    • Events & Workshops
  • Editorials
  • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Disclaimer
    • Privacy Policy
    • Refund and Cancellation Policy
    • Terms of Service
    • Submit Blog Post
Follow US
© Lawyer's Arc 2020-2025. All Rights Reserved.
Lawyer's Arc > Editorials > Current Affairs > Madhya Pradesh High Court: Male Teachers Can’t Claim Privacy Violation for Sending Photos as Attendance Proof
Current AffairsEditorials

Madhya Pradesh High Court: Male Teachers Can’t Claim Privacy Violation for Sending Photos as Attendance Proof

Pankaj Pandey
Last updated: 05/03/2025 11:17 PM
Pankaj Pandey
Published 05/03/2025
Share
1 Min Read
SHARE

Key Takeaways:

  • The Madhya Pradesh High Court has ruled that male teachers cannot claim privacy violation for sending their photographs as attendance proof.
  • The court made this observation while dismissing a petition filed by a male teacher who challenged the practice of sending photographs as attendance proof.
  • The teacher had argued that the practice was a violation of his right to privacy and dignity.
  • However, the court held that the practice was a reasonable requirement for ensuring attendance and that it did not violate the teacher’s right to privacy.
  • The court also observed that the teacher had failed to explain how sending his photograph as attendance proof was a violation of his privacy.
  • The court’s decision was made in response to a petition filed by the teacher challenging the circular issued by the District Education Officer.
  • The circular had made it mandatory for teachers to send their photographs as attendance proof, which the teacher had challenged as being arbitrary and unreasonable.
  • The court’s decision has been seen as a significant ruling on the issue of privacy and attendance proof in the context of government employees.

Related

You Might Also Like

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ORDERS PRESERVATION OF BYJU’S CIRP EMAIL RECORDS AMID CRIMINAL PROBE

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT ORDERS DEPLOYMENT OF CENTRAL ARMED FORCES IN MURSHIDABAD AFTER WAQF ACT PROTEST TURNS VIOLENT

UP COP NAMES JUDGE AS ACCUSED IN THEFT CASE PROCLAMATION, COURT ORDERS PROBE

SUPREME COURT DIRECTS FSSAI TO SUBMIT REPORT ON FRONT-OF-PACKAGE WARNING LABELS WITHIN THREE MONTHS

MADRAS HIGH COURT SLAMS DELAY IN COMPASSIONATE APPOINTMENT, ORDERS JOB FOR DECEASED GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEE’S WIDOW

TAGGED:Madhya Pradesh High Court
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Share
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
YoutubeSubscribe
TelegramFollow

Join Telegram Channel

Join Whatsapp Channel

- Advertisement -
Lawyer's Arc Logo

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
[mc4wp_form]
Popular News
LAW OF TORT

False Imprisonment and Malicious Prosecution Under Tort

LA | Admin
LA | Admin
18/03/2024
Internship Opportunity at Lawyer’s Arc
Right to Freedom of Religion (Articles 25-28)
Advocates (Amendment) Bill, 2025 : The Future of Advocacy in India
Download AIBE 19 Result Live : How & Where to Download Result Aibe XIX
- Advertisement -
Submit Post LAwyer's ArcSubmit Post LAwyer's Arc
- Advertisement -
Archives
False Imprisonment and Malicious Prosecution Under Tort
18/03/2024
Lawyer's Arc Internship
Internship Opportunity at Lawyer’s Arc
23/04/2025
Right to Freedom of Religion (Articles 25-28)
18/03/2024
Advocates Amendment Bill
Advocates (Amendment) Bill, 2025 : The Future of Advocacy in India
22/02/2025
AIBE 19 RESULT DOWNLOAD
Download AIBE 19 Result Live : How & Where to Download Result Aibe XIX
23/03/2025

You Might Also Like

EditorialsNews

SUPREME COURT CLARIFIES PRESIDENT AND GOVERNOR’S POWERS OVER STATE BILLS IN LANDMARK VERDICT

12/04/2025
EditorialsNews

KERALA HIGH COURT GRANTS BAIL TO 91-YEAR-OLD MAN ACCUSED OF ATTACKING 88-YEAR-OLD WIFE OVER ALLEGED INFIDELITY

12/04/2025
EditorialsNews

SUPREME COURT SEEKS DETAILED STATUS REPORT ON ILLEGAL ENCROACHMENTS ALONG RIVER GANGA IN BIHAR

12/04/2025
EditorialsNews

SUPREME COURT REFUSES TO INTERFERE IN RAJASTHAN HC ORDER ON JUDGE’S RECUSAL, EMPHASIZES JUDICIAL IMPARTIALITY

12/04/2025
Lawyer's ArcLawyer's Arc
© Lawyer's Arc 2020-2025. All Rights Reserved.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?