By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Disclaimer.
Accept
Lawyer's ArcLawyer's ArcLawyer's Arc
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Opportunity
    • Paid Law Internships
    • Internships
    • Jobs
    • Events & Workshops
    • Moot Court
    • Call For Papers
  • Editorials
  • Case Analysis
  • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Disclaimer
    • Privacy Policy
    • Refund and Cancellation Policy
    • Terms of Service
  • Submit Blog
  • My Interests
Reading: Madhya Pradesh High Court Declares Bhojshala a Temple, Quashes 2003 ASI Namaz Order
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Font ResizerAa
Lawyer's ArcLawyer's Arc
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Case Analysis
  • Subject Notes
    • LAW OF TORT
    • Constitution Law
    • CRIMINAL LAW
    • Family law
    • Contract Law
    • IPR
    • international law
    • Banking law
    • COMPANY LAW
    • CYBER LAW
    • Environmental law
  • Jobs
  • Opportunity
    • Internships
    • Paid Law Internships
    • Events & Workshops
  • Editorials
  • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Disclaimer
    • Privacy Policy
    • Refund and Cancellation Policy
    • Terms of Service
    • Submit Blog Post
  • Customize Interests
Follow US
© Lawyer's Arc 2020-2026. All Rights Reserved.
Lawyer's Arc > Madhya Pradesh High Court Declares Bhojshala a Temple, Quashes 2003 ASI Namaz Order

Madhya Pradesh High Court Declares Bhojshala a Temple, Quashes 2003 ASI Namaz Order

Madhya Pradesh High Court Rules Bhojshala is a Temple; Quashes 2003 ASI Order Permitting Namaz

Last updated: 15/05/2026 7:57 PM
Published 15/05/2026
Share
4 Min Read
Madhya Pradesh High Court Rules Bhojshala is a Temple; Quashes 2003 ASI Order Permitting Namaz
Madhya Pradesh High Court Rules Bhojshala is a Temple; Quashes 2003 ASI Order Permitting Namaz
SHARE

INDORE — In a landmark judgment delivered on May 15, 2026, the Indore Bench of the Madhya Pradesh High Court has declared the religious character of the disputed Bhojshala Complex in Dhar to be a temple of Goddess Vagdevi (Saraswati) and a centre of Sanskrit learning. The Division Bench, comprising Justice Vijay Kumar Shukla and Justice Alok Awasthi, concluded that the site has been a protected monument since March 18, 1904, and was originally established by King Bhoj of the Parmar dynasty in 1034 AD.

Key Ruling and Quashing of Previous Arrangements

The Court has officially quashed the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) order dated April 7, 2003, which restricted Hindu worship to specific days and permitted the Muslim community to offer Friday Namaz within the complex. The bench ruled that these restrictions on Hindu worship were illegal and hit by Article 25 of the Constitution of India. Furthermore, the Court directed the Government of India and the ASI to take immediate steps for the administration and management of temple affairs and Sanskrit learning within the property.

Findings of the Scientific Survey

A critical factor in the court’s decision was a comprehensive 10-volume scientific survey report submitted by the ASI. The survey, which utilized GPR-GPS technology and carbon dating, concluded that the existing structure was constructed using parts of earlier Hindu temples. Specifically, the ASI report documented:

-Story After Advertisement -
  • The presence of carved pillars, figures of deities like Narasimha and Vishnu, and traditional Hindu architectural fragments beneath the current monument.
  • Evidence of mutilated sculptures and defaced iconography that were reused in later modifications.
  • Sanskrit inscriptions and grammar charts engraved on the walls, confirming the site’s historical role as a “Saraswati Sadan” or school.

Provision for the Muslim Community

To ensure complete justice and maintain communal harmony, the Court has directed the State Government to consider allotting a suitable and permanent piece of land within the Dhar district for the construction of a new mosque or place of prayer for the Muslim community, should they submit an application.

The Return of the Saraswati Idol

The judgment also addressed the long-standing demand to bring back the Pratima (idol) of Goddess Saraswati, which has been housed in the London Museum since the early 20th century. The Court has directed the Government of India to consider existing representations and undertake efforts to re-establish the idol within the Bhojshala complex.

This final order disposes of multiple long-standing writ petitions, effectively replacing temporary administrative arrangements with a permanent legal framework based on archaeological evidence and historical continuity.

-Story After Advertisement -

Case Details

The case citation for the provided final order is 2026:MPHC-IND:8805.

This judgment was delivered by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Indore on May 15, 2026. The lead case is Writ Petition No. 10497 of 2022, titled Hindu Front for Justice (Regd. Trust No. 976) through its President Ms. Ranjana Agnihotri & Ors. vs. Union of India & Ors..

-Story After Advertisement -

The order also disposes of several connected matters, including:

  • Writ Petition No. 10484 of 2022 (Kuldeep Tiwari vs. Union of India & Ors.).
  • Writ Petition No. 28334 of 2019 (Maulana Kamaluddin Welfare Society vs. State of MP & Ors.).
  • Writ Appeal No. 559 of 2026 (Qazi Zakullah & Ors. vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors.).

Related

You Might Also Like

NEET Paper Leak History: From 2015 to 2026 Scandals

Supreme Court Rules: Conversion Ends Scheduled Caste Status, Converted Christians Cannot Claim SC Benefits

Supreme Court Stays Firm on 3-Year Practice Rule for Civil Judges, Extends Application Deadline to April 30

Supreme Court delivered Landmark Judgement on Allowing Passive Euthanasia for Man in 13-Year Vegetative State

US Mulls 500% Tariff Shock On India Amid Growing Tensions Over Russian Oil

Sign Up For Daily Newsletter

Be keep up! Get the latest breaking news delivered straight to your inbox.
[mc4wp_form]
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Use and acknowledge the data practices in our Privacy Policy. You may unsubscribe at any time.
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Share

Updates Just a Click Away ! Follow Us

InstagramFollow
TelegramFollow
1.2kFollow
1.6kFollow

Join Telegram Channel

Join Whatsapp Channel

Lawyer's Arc Logo

Hey! Lawyer's Archian

One click. One opportunity closer to your legal hustle.
[mc4wp_form]
In Trend
LAW OF TORT

False Imprisonment and Malicious Prosecution Under Tort

LA | Admin
LA | Admin
18/03/2024
Internship Opportunity at Lawyer’s Arc
Right to Freedom of Religion (Articles 25-28)
Advocates (Amendment) Bill, 2025 : The Future of Advocacy in India
Download AIBE 19 Result Live : How & Where to Download Result Aibe XIX
- Advertisement -
Submit Post LAwyer's ArcSubmit Post LAwyer's Arc
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Archives
False Imprisonment and Malicious Prosecution Under Tort
18/03/2024
Lawyer's Arc Internship
Internship Opportunity at Lawyer’s Arc
23/04/2025
Right to Freedom of Religion (Articles 25-28)
18/03/2024
Advocates Amendment Bill
Advocates (Amendment) Bill, 2025 : The Future of Advocacy in India
22/02/2025
AIBE 19 RESULT DOWNLOAD
Download AIBE 19 Result Live : How & Where to Download Result Aibe XIX
23/03/2025

You Might Also Like

Justice Surya Kant Take Oath as 53rd Chief Justice Of India

Pankaj Pandey
Pankaj Pandey
24/11/2025

Delhi HC Bans Barring Law Students From Exams Over Attendance Shortfall, Directs BCI to Overhaul Norms

Pankaj Pandey
Pankaj Pandey
03/11/2025

Advocate-Client Privilege is Sacrosanct: Supreme Court bars Investigators from summoning lawyers solely for client case details under Section 132 BSA

Pankaj Pandey
Pankaj Pandey
02/11/2025

BCI Suspends Advocate for Throwing shoe at CJI B.R. Gavai in Supreme Court

Pankaj Pandey
Pankaj Pandey
06/10/2025
Previous Next
Lawyer's ArcLawyer's Arc
© Lawyer's Arc 2020-2026. All Rights Reserved.
Hey Lawyer's Archian !
One click. One opportunity closer to your legal hustle.
[mc4wp_form]
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?