By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Disclaimer.
Accept
Lawyer's ArcLawyer's ArcLawyer's Arc
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Opportunity
    • Paid Law Internships
    • Internships
    • Jobs
    • Events & Workshops
    • Moot Court
    • Call For Papers
  • Editorials
  • Case Analysis
  • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Disclaimer
    • Privacy Policy
    • Refund and Cancellation Policy
    • Terms of Service
  • Submit Blog
  • My Interests
Reading: No 3-Year Practice or 70% Marks Needed: Supreme Court Clears Path for MP Civil Judge Recruitment
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Font ResizerAa
Lawyer's ArcLawyer's Arc
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Case Analysis
  • Subject Notes
    • LAW OF TORT
    • Constitution Law
    • CRIMINAL LAW
    • Family law
    • Contract Law
    • IPR
    • international law
    • Banking law
    • COMPANY LAW
    • CYBER LAW
    • Environmental law
  • Jobs
  • Opportunity
    • Internships
    • Paid Law Internships
    • Events & Workshops
  • Editorials
  • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Disclaimer
    • Privacy Policy
    • Refund and Cancellation Policy
    • Terms of Service
    • Submit Blog Post
  • Customize Interests
Follow US
© Lawyer's Arc 2020-2025. All Rights Reserved.
Lawyer's Arc > No 3-Year Practice or 70% Marks Needed: Supreme Court Clears Path for MP Civil Judge Recruitment

No 3-Year Practice or 70% Marks Needed: Supreme Court Clears Path for MP Civil Judge Recruitment

Supreme Court Secures Fair Entry for MP Civil Judge Aspirants

Last updated: 24/09/2025 9:06 AM
Published 24/09/2025
Share
2 Min Read
From Google: Supreme Court
SHARE

In a landmark decision, the Supreme Court has allowed the 2022 Madhya Pradesh Civil Judge (Junior Division) recruitment process to proceed without enforcing the amended eligibility conditions that required candidates to have either three years of continuous legal practice or 70% marks in their LLB degree obtained in a single attempt.

A bench comprising Justices PS Narasimha and AS Chandurkar set aside the June 13, 2024 order of the Madhya Pradesh High Court which had directed re-computation of marks and exclusion of candidates not fulfilling the amended rules. The Supreme Court clearly observed:

“The June 13 order of the High Court in exercise of revision jurisdiction is set aside. The appeal is allowed.”The Court held further:”The three-year practice or 70% LLB marks conditions shall not be enforced for the 2022 recruitment. The selection process is to proceed according to the original, unamended rules.”

-Story After Advertisement -

This ruling brings relief to thousands of aspirants who had qualified under the earlier criteria and protected their legitimate expectations against retrospective application of new eligibility requirements.

The Supreme Court directed the Madhya Pradesh High Court to conclude the recruitment process based on the original rules without delay.

The controversy arose after the Madhya Pradesh Judicial Services Rules, 1994 were amended on June 23, 2023, making three years of legal practice compulsory or exemption with 70% marks in LLB.

-Story After Advertisement -

The amended rules had been upheld earlier, but litigation continued over their retrospective effect on the 2022 recruitment cycle.


Related

You Might Also Like

BCI Suspends Advocate for Throwing shoe at CJI B.R. Gavai in Supreme Court

SC QUASHES CRUELTY, ABETMENT CHARGES AGAINST IN-LAWS: “VAGUE AND GENERAL ALLEGATIONS” AMOUNT TO ABUSE OF PROCESS

Supreme Court: Advocates Not Liable for Affidavit Contents

AIBE 20 Notification Released: Registration Opens September 29, Exam on November 30, 2025

Greater Noida Dowry Murder Case: Husband Shot During Police Encounter

Sign Up For Daily Newsletter

Be keep up! Get the latest breaking news delivered straight to your inbox.
[mc4wp_form]
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Use and acknowledge the data practices in our Privacy Policy. You may unsubscribe at any time.
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Share

Updates Just a Click Away ! Follow Us

InstagramFollow
TelegramFollow
1.2kFollow
1.6kFollow

Join Telegram Channel

Join Whatsapp Channel

Lawyer's Arc Logo

Hey! Lawyer's Archian

One click. One opportunity closer to your legal hustle.
[mc4wp_form]
In Trend
LAW OF TORT

False Imprisonment and Malicious Prosecution Under Tort

LA | Admin
LA | Admin
18/03/2024
Internship Opportunity at Lawyer’s Arc
Right to Freedom of Religion (Articles 25-28)
Advocates (Amendment) Bill, 2025 : The Future of Advocacy in India
Download AIBE 19 Result Live : How & Where to Download Result Aibe XIX
- Advertisement -
Submit Post LAwyer's ArcSubmit Post LAwyer's Arc
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Archives
False Imprisonment and Malicious Prosecution Under Tort
18/03/2024
Lawyer's Arc Internship
Internship Opportunity at Lawyer’s Arc
23/04/2025
Right to Freedom of Religion (Articles 25-28)
18/03/2024
Advocates Amendment Bill
Advocates (Amendment) Bill, 2025 : The Future of Advocacy in India
22/02/2025
AIBE 19 RESULT DOWNLOAD
Download AIBE 19 Result Live : How & Where to Download Result Aibe XIX
23/03/2025

You Might Also Like

RAHUL GANDHI GRANTED BAIL BY JHARKHAND COURT IN DEFAMATION CASE OVER REMARKS AGAINST AMIT SHAH

Aaryansh Agrawal
Aaryansh Agrawal
07/08/2025

CENTRE REJECTS REVISION PETITIONS AGAINST ‘UDAIPUR FILES’ MOVIE, ALLOWS RELEASE AFTER CUTS

Aaryansh Agrawal
Aaryansh Agrawal
07/08/2025

SUPREME COURT DISSOLVES MARRIAGE, REJECTS ₹12 CRORE ALIMONY CLAIM; AWARDS MUMBAI FLAT AS SETTLEMENT

Aaryansh Agrawal
Aaryansh Agrawal
06/08/2025

THE NEWS MINUTE CHALLENGES GAG ORDERS IN KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OVER DHARMASTHALA COVERAGE

Aaryansh Agrawal
Aaryansh Agrawal
06/08/2025
Previous Next
Lawyer's ArcLawyer's Arc
© Lawyer's Arc 2020-2025. All Rights Reserved.
Hey Lawyer's Archian !
One click. One opportunity closer to your legal hustle.
[mc4wp_form]
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?