By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Lawyer's ArcLawyer's ArcLawyer's Arc
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Opportunity
    • Paid Law Internships
    • Internships
    • Jobs
    • Events & Workshops
    • Moot Court
    • Call For Papers
  • Editorials
  • Case Analysis
  • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Disclaimer
    • Privacy Policy
    • Refund and Cancellation Policy
    • Terms of Service
  • Submit Blog
Reading: BOMBAY HIGH COURT SEEKS MAHARASHTRA GOVERNMENT’S RESPONSE ON REMOVAL OF TWO-FINGER TEST FROM MEDICAL CURRICULUM
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Font ResizerAa
Lawyer's ArcLawyer's Arc
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Case Analysis
  • Subject Notes
  • Jobs
  • Opportunity
  • Editorials
  • About Us
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Case Analysis
  • Subject Notes
    • LAW OF TORT
    • Constitution Law
    • CRIMINAL LAW
    • Family law
    • Contract Law
    • IPR
    • international law
    • Banking law
    • COMPANY LAW
    • CYBER LAW
    • Environmental law
  • Jobs
  • Opportunity
    • Internships
    • Paid Law Internships
    • Events & Workshops
  • Editorials
  • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Disclaimer
    • Privacy Policy
    • Refund and Cancellation Policy
    • Terms of Service
    • Submit Blog Post
Follow US
© Lawyer's Arc 2020-2025. All Rights Reserved.
Lawyer's Arc > Editorials > BOMBAY HIGH COURT SEEKS MAHARASHTRA GOVERNMENT’S RESPONSE ON REMOVAL OF TWO-FINGER TEST FROM MEDICAL CURRICULUM
EditorialsNews

BOMBAY HIGH COURT SEEKS MAHARASHTRA GOVERNMENT’S RESPONSE ON REMOVAL OF TWO-FINGER TEST FROM MEDICAL CURRICULUM

Yash Singhal
Last updated: 09/04/2025 9:56 PM
Yash Singhal
Published 09/04/2025
Share
3 Min Read
SHARE

The Bombay High Court at Nagpur has sought a response from the Maharashtra state government in a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) concerning the continued inclusion of the controversial “two-finger test” or virginity test in the MBBS curriculum.

Contents
PIL HIGHLIGHTS VIOLATION OF PRIVACY AND MEDICAL ETHICSCOURT REFERENCES SUPREME COURT’S 2022 JUDGMENTSTEPS TAKEN BY AUTHORITIES: NMC AND MINISTRY GUIDELINESCURRICULUM CHANGES AT MAHARASHTRA UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCESCOURT’S DIRECTIONS AND NEXT HEARINGLEGAL REPRESENTATION

PIL HIGHLIGHTS VIOLATION OF PRIVACY AND MEDICAL ETHICS

The petition was filed by Smita Sarode Singalkar, raising serious concerns over the persistence of the two-finger test in medical education. She argued that the test:

  • Violates the right to privacy of sexual assault survivors.
  • Is both morally and scientifically indefensible.

COURT REFERENCES SUPREME COURT’S 2022 JUDGMENT

The Division Bench of Justice Nitin W. Sambre and Justice Vrushali V. Joshi emphasized the State’s duty to comply with the Supreme Court’s 2022 ruling in State of Jharkhand vs. Shailendra Kumar Rai.

-Story After Advertisement -

In this landmark decision, the Supreme Court directed both Union and State governments to:

“Ensure compliance with the Centre’s Ministry of Health and Family Welfare’s guidelines on the eradication of the two-finger test and other invasive practices from the medical examination of sexual assault survivors.”

Additionally, the apex court called for:

-Story After Advertisement -

Workshops for healthcare providers, and

Curriculum reviews to eliminate unscientific and discriminatory practices.

STEPS TAKEN BY AUTHORITIES: NMC AND MINISTRY GUIDELINES

The High Court took note of efforts already made by central health authorities. On August 18, 2022, the National Medical Commission (NMC) issued guidelines instructing that:

-Story After Advertisement -

“The two-finger test should be removed from medical practice and students should be educated on the unscientific basis of such tests.”

CURRICULUM CHANGES AT MAHARASHTRA UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES

The Maharashtra University of Health Sciences (MUHS), a primary respondent in the case, has reportedly updated its second-year MBBS anatomy curriculum by these guidelines.

The revised curriculum aims to:

-Story After Advertisement -

“Equip medical professionals to explain the legitimacy and unscientific nature of virginity tests, including the two-finger test on female genitalia.”

COURT’S DIRECTIONS AND NEXT HEARING

Despite the modifications, the High Court directed the State Government and the University to submit a detailed report within two weeks, specifically outlining:

  • Steps taken to implement the Supreme Court’s directives,
  • Status of compliance with Ministry and NMC guidelines.

The matter is now scheduled for the next hearing on April 9, 2025.

-Story After Advertisement -

LEGAL REPRESENTATION

  • Advocate Renuka Sirpurkar appeared for the petitioner, Smita Singalkar.
  • Additional Government Pleader DP Thakare represented the State of Maharashtra.
  • Advocate Abhijit Deshpande appeared on behalf of the Maharashtra University of Health Sciences.
  • Advocate Rahul Bhangade represented the Union government.

Related

You Might Also Like

SUPREME COURT STRUGGLES WITH JUSTICE SURESHWAR THAKUR’S JUDGMENT, STAYS HIGH COURT ORDER ON NATIONAL HIGHWAYS ACT

India-Pakistan Tensions: Pakistan Breaches Ceasefire Again Despite Recent Agreement with India

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ORDERS PRESERVATION OF BYJU’S CIRP EMAIL RECORDS AMID CRIMINAL PROBE

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT ORDERS DEPLOYMENT OF CENTRAL ARMED FORCES IN MURSHIDABAD AFTER WAQF ACT PROTEST TURNS VIOLENT

UP COP NAMES JUDGE AS ACCUSED IN THEFT CASE PROCLAMATION, COURT ORDERS PROBE

TAGGED:Bombay High Court
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Share
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
YoutubeSubscribe
TelegramFollow

Join Telegram Channel

Join Whatsapp Channel

- Advertisement -
Lawyer's Arc Logo

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
[mc4wp_form]
Popular News
LAW OF TORT

False Imprisonment and Malicious Prosecution Under Tort

LA | Admin
LA | Admin
18/03/2024
Internship Opportunity at Lawyer’s Arc
Right to Freedom of Religion (Articles 25-28)
Advocates (Amendment) Bill, 2025 : The Future of Advocacy in India
Download AIBE 19 Result Live : How & Where to Download Result Aibe XIX
- Advertisement -
Submit Post LAwyer's ArcSubmit Post LAwyer's Arc
- Advertisement -
Archives
False Imprisonment and Malicious Prosecution Under Tort
18/03/2024
Lawyer's Arc Internship
Internship Opportunity at Lawyer’s Arc
23/04/2025
Right to Freedom of Religion (Articles 25-28)
18/03/2024
Advocates Amendment Bill
Advocates (Amendment) Bill, 2025 : The Future of Advocacy in India
22/02/2025
AIBE 19 RESULT DOWNLOAD
Download AIBE 19 Result Live : How & Where to Download Result Aibe XIX
23/03/2025

You Might Also Like

EditorialsNews

SUPREME COURT DIRECTS FSSAI TO SUBMIT REPORT ON FRONT-OF-PACKAGE WARNING LABELS WITHIN THREE MONTHS

13/04/2025
EditorialsNews

MADRAS HIGH COURT SLAMS DELAY IN COMPASSIONATE APPOINTMENT, ORDERS JOB FOR DECEASED GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEE’S WIDOW

13/04/2025
EditorialsNews

SUPREME COURT CLARIFIES PRESIDENT AND GOVERNOR’S POWERS OVER STATE BILLS IN LANDMARK VERDICT

12/04/2025
EditorialsNews

KERALA HIGH COURT GRANTS BAIL TO 91-YEAR-OLD MAN ACCUSED OF ATTACKING 88-YEAR-OLD WIFE OVER ALLEGED INFIDELITY

12/04/2025
Lawyer's ArcLawyer's Arc
© Lawyer's Arc 2020-2025. All Rights Reserved.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?