By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Lawyer's ArcLawyer's ArcLawyer's Arc
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Opportunity
    • Paid Law Internships
    • Internships
    • Jobs
    • Events & Workshops
    • Moot Court
    • Call For Papers
  • Editorials
  • Case Analysis
  • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Disclaimer
    • Privacy Policy
    • Refund and Cancellation Policy
    • Terms of Service
  • Submit Blog
Reading: DELHI COURT CLOSES CORRUPTION CASE AGAINST AAP LEADER SATYENDAR JAIN AFTER CBI FINDS NO EVIDENCE
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Font ResizerAa
Lawyer's ArcLawyer's Arc
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Case Analysis
  • Subject Notes
  • Jobs
  • Opportunity
  • Editorials
  • About Us
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Case Analysis
  • Subject Notes
    • LAW OF TORT
    • Constitution Law
    • CRIMINAL LAW
    • Family law
    • Contract Law
    • IPR
    • international law
    • Banking law
    • COMPANY LAW
    • CYBER LAW
    • Environmental law
  • Jobs
  • Opportunity
    • Internships
    • Paid Law Internships
    • Events & Workshops
  • Editorials
  • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Disclaimer
    • Privacy Policy
    • Refund and Cancellation Policy
    • Terms of Service
    • Submit Blog Post
Follow US
© Lawyer's Arc 2020-2025. All Rights Reserved.
Lawyer's Arc > DELHI COURT CLOSES CORRUPTION CASE AGAINST AAP LEADER SATYENDAR JAIN AFTER CBI FINDS NO EVIDENCE

DELHI COURT CLOSES CORRUPTION CASE AGAINST AAP LEADER SATYENDAR JAIN AFTER CBI FINDS NO EVIDENCE

Aaryansh Agrawal
Last updated: 04/08/2025 7:38 PM
Published 04/08/2025
Share
2 Min Read
Delhi High Court
SHARE

NEW DELHI, AUGUST 4 2025 – A Delhi court on Monday closed the long-standing corruption case against Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leader Satyendar Jain, after the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) submitted a closure report citing lack of evidence.

The case, titled CBI v. Satyendar Jain & Ors, came to a conclusion before Special Judge (PC Act) Dig Vinay Singh of the Rouse Avenue Courts, who accepted the CBI’s closure report.

COURT FINDS “NO MATERIAL WHATSOEVER” TO SUGGEST CORRUPTION

After nearly four years of investigation, the CBI found no proof of corruption, criminal conspiracy, or personal gain. The Court emphasized that the law requires more than mere suspicion to move forward with legal proceedings.

-Story After Advertisement -

“There is no material whatsoever even to suggest a criminal conspiracy,” the Court observed.

It added:

“The allegations, as presented, and the factual background are not sufficient to warrant further investigation or to initiate proceedings. The law clearly states that suspicion cannot replace proof. It is also worth noting that, even to charge someone, mere suspicion is not enough; at least strong suspicion would be necessary to proceed.”

-Story After Advertisement -

Following these findings, the court proceeded to close the case.

BACKGROUND OF THE CASE

The case originated from a 2019 vigilance department complaint, which led to an FIR in May of that year. It was alleged that Satyendar Jain, during his tenure as Public Works Department (PWD) Minister in the Delhi government, bypassed standard recruitment procedures by outsourcing the hiring of 17 consultants.

CBI REPORT: TRANSPARENT RECRUITMENT DUE TO URGENT NEEDS

According to the CBI, the hiring was justified due to urgent departmental needs, and the recruitment process was both transparent and competitive. The agency confirmed that it found no evidence of corruption, undue favour, or personal benefit.

-Story After Advertisement -

COURT ALLOWS SCOPE FOR FUTURE INVESTIGATION

Although the case is now closed, the Court noted that:

“If any fresh material is received against anyone, the CBI would be at liberty to investigate the matter further.”


Related

You Might Also Like

RAHUL GANDHI GRANTED BAIL BY JHARKHAND COURT IN DEFAMATION CASE OVER REMARKS AGAINST AMIT SHAH

CENTRE REJECTS REVISION PETITIONS AGAINST ‘UDAIPUR FILES’ MOVIE, ALLOWS RELEASE AFTER CUTS

SUPREME COURT DISSOLVES MARRIAGE, REJECTS ₹12 CRORE ALIMONY CLAIM; AWARDS MUMBAI FLAT AS SETTLEMENT

THE NEWS MINUTE CHALLENGES GAG ORDERS IN KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OVER DHARMASTHALA COVERAGE

CASE BACKGROUND: CHALLENGE TO AMENDMENTS IN THE PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT, 1988

Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Share

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
YoutubeSubscribe
TelegramFollow

Join Telegram Channel

Join Whatsapp Channel

- Advertisement -
Lawyer's Arc Logo

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
[mc4wp_form]
Popular News
LAW OF TORT

False Imprisonment and Malicious Prosecution Under Tort

LA | Admin
LA | Admin
18/03/2024
Internship Opportunity at Lawyer’s Arc
Right to Freedom of Religion (Articles 25-28)
Advocates (Amendment) Bill, 2025 : The Future of Advocacy in India
Download AIBE 19 Result Live : How & Where to Download Result Aibe XIX
- Advertisement -
Submit Post LAwyer's ArcSubmit Post LAwyer's Arc
- Advertisement -
Archives
False Imprisonment and Malicious Prosecution Under Tort
18/03/2024
Lawyer's Arc Internship
Internship Opportunity at Lawyer’s Arc
23/04/2025
Right to Freedom of Religion (Articles 25-28)
18/03/2024
Advocates Amendment Bill
Advocates (Amendment) Bill, 2025 : The Future of Advocacy in India
22/02/2025
AIBE 19 RESULT DOWNLOAD
Download AIBE 19 Result Live : How & Where to Download Result Aibe XIX
23/03/2025

You Might Also Like

SUPREME COURT TO HEAR PLEA ON AUGUST 8 SEEKING RESTORATION OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR’S STATEHOOD

05/08/2025

“You Are Educated, You Should Earn Yourself”: Supreme Court’s Scathing Remark to MBA Wife Seeking ₹12 Crore Alimony

05/08/2025

MP HIGH COURT ACQUITS FATHER-SON DUO IN MURDER CASE, ORDERS PROBE INTO POLICE FOR PLANTING WITNESSES

04/08/2025

KARNATAKA SCHOOL WATER TANK POISONING CASE: THREE ACCUSED SENT TO JUDICIAL CUSTODY TILL AUGUST 11

04/08/2025
Lawyer's ArcLawyer's Arc
© Lawyer's Arc 2020-2025. All Rights Reserved.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?